.
Feedback

Superintendent Proposes $44.87M School Budget for 2013-14

Superintendent Jerome Belair proposes a 1.5 percent increase in school funding for next year.

Wednesday, in a meeting with two reporters, Superintendent Jerome Belair revealed his proposed $44.87 million budget for the 2013-14 school year, a 1.51 percent increase from this year’s $44.2 million total.

Belair said this was one of the lowest percentage increases proposed "in Waterford history" for the school department’s budget, as the school budget has increased by 3 percent each of the last two years. He said his budget was held down thanks to long-term planning by the school district and by finding ways to offer better services for the same or less cost.

“When you get in a pickle, you can make short-term cuts that will help you that year,” said Belair, referring to the situation he faced in the 2011-12 budget when Waterford had to eliminate more than 20 positions from the school district. “We didn’t do that. We always looked at the long-term approach.”

The proposal adds a guidance counselor at Clark Lane Middle School and an extra security guard at the high school. It also strengthens the talented and gifted program and math support in Waterford's three elementary schools. Belair also proposed reducing two teaching positions at the high school, which he said should have a “minimal impact” on class sizes, and adds them to the elementary schools, which currently have classes as large as 25 students.

“I believe the budget both sustains our tradition of excellence and our obligation of prudent financial management,” Belair wrote on the opening page of his 105-page proposed budget. “The Recommended Budget presents a spending plan that will allow the Waterford Public Schools to fulfill its educational mission and supports each of the Board’s adopted Budget Assumptions.”

The Board of Education will review the budget tonight and on January 17th during two budget workshops that are open to the public. Then, on January 24th, the Board of Education will meet to take final action on the budget.

Details

The largest reason for the $666,197 increase in Belair’s proposal is a $430,161 increase in tuition Waterford pays to other schools for Waterford students who choose to attend other schools than Waterford. Another large increase is a $319,963 increase the town has to pay for special education, which is from the state cutting its aid to towns for special education and for more students needing more expensive services, he said.

“When you see an increase, it is generally around something we don’t control,” Belair said.

There is a $569,016 increase in salaries as well, although that is balanced out by a $354,080 decrease in health care thanks to “aggressive” negotiating, Belair said. That’s a drastic change from the last two years, where heath care costs were the biggest increases in the school’s budget.

This year, Belair returned $550,000 in the health care line item to the town. The reasons were many, but chief among them was because he negotiated concessions to employees’ health benefit contracts. Health insurance premiums will actually increase 12 percent next year, but that is off a baseline $550,000 below what was approved for this year, he said.

Belair proposed adding an extra guidance counselor at the middle school because, right now, each middle school guidance counselor serves more than 300 children. By adding a third counselor, each will serve 218 students, which aligns with the state’s guidelines.

He also proposed taking two teaching positions from the high school and adding them to the elementary schools to keep all elementary class sizes below 22 students. This year, some fifth grade classes have 25 students. Belair could not guarantee that eliminating the two positions at the high school would not result in layoffs, although he said he was trying to find a way to do it through attrition.

He could reduce the number of high school teachers and have a “minimal” impact on class sizes because the overall enrollment at the high school is projected to drop by 41 students. Overall, Belair is projecting the enrollment in Waterford schools to drop by 97 students next year, from 2,626 to 2,529.

He also proposed adding an extra security guard at the high school because he said the new school is so large, it requires a second security guard along with the police officer stationed at the high school. He said the decision to add the security guard was made before the Newtown tragedy.

Meeting Tonight

There is a budget workshop tonight and on January 17th from 7 to 9 inside Town Hall where the administration will go through the entire budget. The meetings are open to the public and the meeting will be taped and added to the school district’s website as well.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !