.
Feedback

Parents Sue Waterford Schools After Child Breaks Arm

The parents of a Clark Lane Middle School student are suing the Waterford School District after their child was allegedly bullied for years, resulting in a broken arm.

The parents of a middle school student are suing the Waterford School District after a boy allegedly bullied their son in school for years, culminating with him pushing their son to the ground and breaking his arm.

David and Michele Baldi recently filed a lawsuit against Milagros Dominguez, the Waterford School District and the Waterford Board of Education after Dominquez’s son allegedly pushed their son to the ground at school, resulting in a broken arm. They said Dominquez’s son has bullied their child for years and the Waterford School District did little to stop it.

“The Defendant, the Waterford School District, failed to make any effort to protect (the alleged victim) from the defendant when it knew or should have known that (the defendant) posed an imminent danger to (the alleged victim),” wrote the Baldis' lawyer, Elizabeth Woodhull of Gould & Gillin, in a legal complaint.

Meanwhile Assistant Superintendent Craig Powers disagreed with that assessment. He said he believes Waterford has a robust anti-bullying program and said he felt confident that this case will prove that.

“I assure you that Clark Lane (Middle School) takes bullying very seriously and investigates everything and puts in precautions when needed,” Powers said. “And I feel confident that this case will also prove that out.”

The Baldis are suing for “money damages, costs and expenses, attorney fees and such other and further relief as the court deems just and proper,” according to the complaint. They are seeking more than $15,000, according to the complaint.

The Complaint

On June 15, 2012, the last day of school, the Baldis’ son and Dominquez’s son were waiting for the bus at Clark Lane Middle School. There, Dominquez’s son pushed the Baldis’ son, causing him to break his arm, according to the complaint.

In the complaint, the Baldis allege that their son has been bullied by Dominquez’s son since the fourth grade. They said her son subjected their son to “name calling, pushing and other forms of bullying,” according to the complaint.

The Baldis are suing the Waterford School District and the Waterford Board of Education for allegedly not supervising the two students while they waited for the school bus and for allegedly not protecting their son from Dominquez’s son. They said the school district “failed to take steps to ensure that (their son) could attend school in a safe environment free from harassment and bullying,” according to the complaint.

“The defendant, Waterford School District, failed to supervise (the alleged victim) and the defendant when it knew or should have known that the defendant posed a danger to (the alleged victim),” the complaint read.

Waterford's Response

Powers said if there is a pattern of bullying between two students, it is addressed. While he wouldn’t comment directly on if there was a long history between the two students, citing privacy constraints, he did say he did not "see eye-to-eye” with everything in the complaint.

Powers said students are supervised when they get onto the school buses at the end of the day. He said it was an unfortunate accident that happened that could happen anywhere, but said the school had adequate supervision. 

“Could someone be pushed and could someone fall? That could happen when my sister is watching her own children,” Powers said.

Powers said all Waterford schools take bullying very seriously and are required to report all acts of bullying to the state. He said Clark Lane Middle School in particular has several programs designed to prevent bullying.

Thursday phone calls to the Baldis and Woodhull were not returned.  

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !