.
Feedback

I Do Solemnly Swear

An opinion on gun control

This Monday, in Washington D.C., Barrack Hussein Obama will place his left hand on the Bible and solemnly swear to defend the Constitution of the United States. He will be doing this for the second time! The first time, they had to redo the swearing in privately, because the first time was flubbed. That was an omen. It was a sign of the next four years.


When it comes to what he should place his hand on, if the person was Muslim, would he use the Quran? If he was Mormon, maybe the Book of Mormon? What about an Atheist? The Constitution does not state that it has to be on the Bible!

What I find detestable about his first swearing in is that he has failed to not only defend the Constitution in his administration, but has also failed to give indication that the Bible has any basis in his Presidency.  Then on Monday, even more disgusting is he will be using bibles owned by President Lincoln and Martin Luther King Jr.

Since the election, we are seeing more of the real Obama. The real agenda is coming to light. He now has the "flexibility" he promised to move forward his plan.

This past week, he jumped all over the opportunity to exploit the Newtown tragedy for his own agenda. To start his attack of the second amendment.  He paraded out four kids as pawns to lay out his 23 point plan to control guns. This plan must have been drafted together by Biden during one of his train rides to D.C and in between naps. On a roll of train station toilet paper. With a crayon, or sharpie. Sharpie the marker, not a sharp object! Something that should never be in the hands of this Vice President!

Though there are some good points in this plan, like initiatives for school safety, or mandatory background checks, they are outweighed by the idiotic ones.

Like, having doctors question patients as to ownership. Really? Do you really think this will be effective in gun control? Let's see:

Patient 1 (Legal Gun Owner)
Doctor: "So now that we have your exam out of the way, can you please list the types of guns you currently own"
Legal Gun Owner: "With all due respect doc..that's none of your business"

Patient 2 (Illegal Gun Owner)
Doctor: "So now we have bandaged all your wounds, and the police are ready to transport you, can you please list the types of guns you own? "
Illegal Gun Owner: "Guns? I don't own no stinking guns!"

How about the ban on assault rifles? On high capacity magazines! Hey, it did not work the first time, why would it work this time. Now only criminals would have them!


The gun laws in Chicago are stricter than this plan and look at the crime rate there. Does anybody in this administration actually do any kind of actual research on gun control.


Look at Kennesaw Georgia. In 1982, they passed a law that required all homes to have a firearm. Crime dropped 89% the next year and has consistently been low since. It's not that hard to figure out that if a criminal knows for a fact that a person either has a gun in his home or on his person, they will think twice. The argument that criminals will come for the guns in the house doesn't hold water. The owner always has the advantage by knowing the location of the firearm and the lay of his home. We have some recent examples of that. Last week in Georgia, one lady shot a man several times defending herself and kids. if there was no gun the result would have been 4 dead people and one criminal on the loose.

But we don't hear about these examples, because they don't move forward Obama's agenda.

The second amendment is just one part of the Constitution Obama will fail to defend over the next four years and he should stay away from the Bible. There is no faith there in that soul.

If Obama wants to show any signs of integrity this second go round, maybe he should raise his right hand, place his left on, oh let's say, " The Essentials Works of Socialism" by Irving Howe. How about "Socialism Past, Present and Future" by Michael Harrington . And then swear to defend only the parts of the Constitution he likes and change the rest.

Then and only then would Obama show credibility. At least for that fleeting moment.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !