.
Feedback

RTM Approves Salary Increases For Dispatchers

Waterford Board Gives Salary Raises Of 2.25 Percent, 2.25 Percent, 2.25 Percent And 2.5 Percent To Police Chief, Fire Director And Nine Town Dispatchers

Monday night, after some discussion to the contrary, the Representative Town Meeting granted salary increases to the town’s nine dispatchers, the fire marshal, the police chief and the director of fire services of at least 2.25 percent for the next four years.

The RTM has full control over the salaries of aforementioned 12 positions, as they are non-union employees. However, First Selectman Dan Steward said the group, who follow what is known as the public safety wage schedule, have been following the police contract for more than 40 years.

“We’ve continued to follow that process (since it was installed), with no reason to change it,” Steward said. “These people are on the front line of our public service system.”

The RTM voted 15 to 4 to give all 12 of the employees raises, with Andrea Kanfer, Richard Muckle, Theodore Olynciw and Janet Smith the four members to vote against it. Muckle, Olynciw and Smith dominated the beginning of the debate on the issue, saying they couldn’t vote for raises in the depressed economy.

“I can’t keep giving increases in salary and expect our seniors to pay for it,” Smith said. “For a couple of years, while we are paying for the schools, we should work together as a team, as a town, suck it up and do what we have to do.”

But they were eventually overruled by others on the RTM, who said the public safety personnel work tough jobs with night hours and deserve the raises.

“These employees work 24-hours-a-day, around the clock,” RTM Moderator Tom Dembek said. “It is a fairly different type of job than an 8-to-4 job.”

RTM member Marc Balestracci agreed, who said he would expect tougher contracts for other employees, but not emergency personnel who work all hours.

“I think this kind of work takes a bigger mental toll on a person,” Balestracci said.

Specifics

The RTM approved raises of 2.25 percent for the upcoming fiscal year, 2.25 percent for 2013-14, 2.25 percent for 2014-15 and 2.5 percent for 2015-16. The group will also pay the same percentage in its cost sharing for health care the next three years – 11 percent – with that number increasing to 12 percent effective July 2015.

The public safety schedule is one year behind the police contract, , and matches the raises in that contract, Steward said. However Muckle and Olynciw questioned why the employees do not pay more in their health insurance cost sharing when the cost

“I think it is very unreasonable to maintain this very low participation level,” Olynciw said.

The Personnel Review Board approved the salary structure in April, and forwarded it to the RTM. The overall increase of salaries alone, including steps, in the first year to taxpayers would be $21,000, according to Steward.

Numbers

The average straight-time salary of the 12 people on the public safety schedule will be $63,793 in July, according to documents provided by Steward. That number will increase to $65,613 in 2013, to $67,877 in 2014 and $69,806 in 2015.

The salaries of dispatchers will range from $37,926 to $50,851 in July, with most at $50,851 because they are at the top step, Steward said. Those numbers will increase to $43,923 to $58,869 by 2015, according to the documents. They can also can work overtime.

The chief of police and director of fire services are currently both paid over $100,000 a year, and are salary employees.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !