.
Feedback

Waterford BOF Begins Review of Budget Proposal That Increases Spending by 4.16%

Despite a month of hearings, board member J.W. “Bill” Sheehan believes the board will do little to trim the town’s $81.96 budget proposal for the 2013-14 fiscal year.

J.W. “Bill” Sheehan’s words proved prophetic, at least for the night.

Monday night, the Board of Finance held its first of a month’s-worth of meetings to review the town’s $81.96 million budget proposal for the 2013-14 fiscal year, a 4.16 percent increase over this year’s $78.79 million total. Sheehan began the meeting by saying that the Board of Finance will likely go through each department’s budget in tedious detail, cutting $1,000 here and $50 there, but ultimately will do little to change the proposal.

“Any large reductions will mean that the Board of Finance decided that a certain program should be eliminated, a service should be reduced or eliminated or that a capital project be deferred to a later date,” Sheehan said. “I don’t expect that to happen unless the public shows up strongly recommending a cut of a particular service or project. In reality, during the next month, we’ll see the Board of Finance make small reductions around the edges of the budget.”

And that’s exactly what happened Monday night. The finance board reviewed six department budgets totaling several million dollars, and cut $10,000 from Public Health and Nursing’s proposal and $11,315 from the Recreation and Parks Commission’s budget. The cuts will have little impact on the eventual tax rate.

The projected tax increase for next year is not yet known, as the revenue projections have not yet been finalized, according to Finance Director Rudie Beers. Town revenues, which are mainly federal and state funds, will likely go down, Sheehan said. Without that finalized, the town cannot say how much more money it will need from local taxpayers.

The Proposal

The budget proposal for the 2013-14 fiscal year is a 4.16 percent increase, or $3.28 million more, than this year’s total. The budget would take effect in July, and would be reflected in the July tax bills.

The biggest increase in the budget proposal overall is an increase in bonding to pay for the town’s five new schools. The town will spend $1.8 million more on school bonding next year, which represents roughly half of the increase in the proposal.

The Board of Education’s $44.62 million proposal is a $423,405 increase from this year’s $44.2 million total, or a 0.96 percent increase. Meanwhile, the municipal government’s operating budget increases by $1 million, from $28.6 million to $29.6 million, or a 3.63 percent increase, in the proposal.

The largest proposed increase for the municipal government is a $329,223 increase in insurance costs, mostly from a large increase in health insurance costs. The other large increases in the municipal government’s proposal is and $106,886 more for the fire department’s budget.

The Board of Finance can only cut the budget, it cannot add any dollars to any line item. The board will review all the department’s budgets this month and make a final recommendation on March 28th. Then the Representative Town Meeting will review and finalize the 2013-14 budget in early May.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 22, 2013 at 06:57 pm
That's wonderful Naty! If we can get enough people like yourself, who care, we really might be ableRead More to save Cohanzie!
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !