.
Feedback

Selectmen Approve $5.2M Budget for Waterford Police Department

The Waterford Board of Selectmen, who rejected the department’s first proposal, approved a 4.16 percent increase in funding for the police department for the 2013-14 fiscal year.

Tuesday night, the Board of Selectmen approved a $5.2 million budget proposal by the Waterford Police Department for the 2013-14 fiscal year,

The proposal is a 4.16 percent increase, or $207,729 more, than this year’s $4.99 million total. But First Selectman Dan Steward said the budget is justified because of the increased security needs following the Sandy Hook shootings and because the proposal reflected two years of salary increases, when most other budgets only reflected one.

“With all the issues going on, it would be inappropriate not to fund them completely,” Steward said.

Last Tuesday, the police department proposed a $5.3 million budget, or a 6.32 percent increase from this year’s total, but the Board of Selectmen agreed the total was too high. They sent the budget back to Waterford Police Chief Murray Pendleton and told him to resubmit a budget that was around $5.15 million.

Pendleton said many of the increases in the proposal were out of his control, as they were the result of contracted raises and benefits, accounts he has no control over or from unfunded state mandates. With little else to choose from, Pendleton cut $100,000 from the replacement overtime – which also meant a $7,650 cut to town payouts to Social Security and Medicare – although history shows he underfunded the line item.

In the 2011-12 fiscal year, the department spent $198,329 on replacement overtime, according to Finance Director Rudie Beers. In the 2012-13 fiscal year, which is only half complete, the department has spent $115,814.

Pendleton originally proposed budgeted $250,000 for replacement overtime, but now will only budget $150,000. Pendleton said there is a good chance he would have to come back to the town at the end of the year for more money, but Steward said that is better than having the taxpayers pay for the overtime upfront.

“We don’t know what that line item will be,” Steward said. “At least now we aren’t potentially overtaxing the taxpayers.”

Replacement Overtime

Replacement overtime is when a shift is vacated by a police officer because they are on vacation or on sick leave, among other reasons, and another police officer is used to fill the shift, Pendleton said. Right now, the police department only fills 45 percent of the vacated shifts, Waterford Police Lt. David Burton said.

Ideally, there are five patrol officers on every shift, along with a supervisor, Pendleton said. That number dwindles when police officers take vacation or take sick leave, but the department never allows it to get below three patrol officers on at a time, Burton said.

The line item has historically been underfunded, and often the police department has to get money from the town’s contingency fund at the end of the year to balance its budget, Pendleton said. He said a $100,000 cut in replacement overtime could mean the department is going to have to ask for more money at the end of the fiscal year, which Steward acknowledged.

Adding to the problem, the police officer’s salaries have increased each of the past two years, although last year the increase was not reflected in the budget because the police officers' contract was settled too late. With salaries higher, replacement overtime should increase, Beers said.

At the meeting, Pendleton gave a speech detailing the increased pressures and mandates the police department is facing and said he hopes a committee can be formed to have more control over all the line items in the budget. Steward agreed, and said he thought the police department did an excellent job.

"Truly we believe we have the best police department in the area,” Steward said. “Going forward, we will find the money to make this right. Because ultimately, we expect this police force to provide the best job we can.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !