.
Feedback

Two Murders, One Trial Date

Jury selection for the trial of Dickie Anderson, accused of killing two women in Waterford and Norwich, set to begin February 6.

After more than a decade, two murder cases will finally make their way to court. On Thursday, New London Superior Court Judge Arthur C. Hadden set February 6 as the date for jury selection to begin in the trial of Dickie Anderson.  

Anderson, 41, is charged with the murder of two women, Renee Pellegrino who was found strangled to death on Parkway South in Waterford in 1997 and Michelle Comeau, who was found dead near Norwich Industrial Park near the Franklin town line in 1998. The Pellegrino murder had been a cold case until DNA testing implicated Anderson.

Although no DNA evidence links Anderson to the Comeau murder, he reportedly admitted to having sex with both women the day they died. Both women were strangled and their naked bodies looked to be posed when police found them. The two murders were similar enough in nature to lead the state’s medical examiner to conclude it was likely the work of one killer.

Earlier this month, Judge Hadden had ruled in favor of the state’s motion to consolidate both cases, allowing both murders to be tried together. On December 29, he denied a defense motion to reconsider his earlier decision to consolidate the case.

Judge Hadden also denied a defense motion to dismiss the Comeau case based on speedy trial issues. Christopher Duby, one of two defense attorneys representing Anderson, said he had been ready to proceed to trial in that case before the two murders were consolidated.

Defense Attorney John Walkley, meanwhile, said he had not been ready to proceed to trial with the Pellegrino case because the state had not provided the defense with DNA evidence for testing. Senior Assistant State’s Attorney David Smith disputed that, saying his office had sent the evidence to the defense in May.

Either way, the defense motion asking the judge to compel the state to turn over that evidence became a moot point. The defense team received the requested DNA evidence from the state’s attorney on December 15.

That doesn’t give the defense much time to have the evidence tested, however. Walkley said he hoped to have the test results back within 30 to 60 days but with the holidays, it was hard to say and he didn’t yet know when the defense expert would be available to testify.

Given the circumstances, Judge Hadden granted the defense request to push the trial date back a week from the February 1 date he originally had in mind to February 6.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !