.
Feedback

L+M Report: Obesity, Access to Care Main Health Issues in NL County

Lawrence & Memorial Hospital contracts study to examine issues in its service area

New London County has a higher than average obesity rate as well as issues involving access to health care, according to a community health needs assessment study.

Lawrence & Memorial Hospital issued the results of the study this morning. The assessment identifies cancer and access to care as the top prioritized community health needs, followed by issues related to cancer, sexual health, mental and behavioral health, and asthma.

The hospital hired Holleran Consulting of Lancaster, Pa., to conduct the study in 2012. Janeen Maxwell, a health and human services consultant with the company, said the goal of the study is to identify health priorities and set goals and strategies to address them.

According to the study, 26 percent of adults in New London County reported a body mass index of 30 or greater, indicating obesity, in 2010. The percentage of obese adults in Connecticut at the time was reported as 23.1 percent.

A 2007 assessment reported that 36.4 percent and 41 percent of pre-kindergarten girls and boys, respectively, in the New London Public Schools were overweight or obese. The level was at 44.9 percent for fourth grade boys and 58.6 percent for fourth grade girls.

Maxwell said the data is sometimes dated and is based on the last available information.

“Sometimes 2007 was the last time they released a specific data point,” she said.

Maxwell said that the study identified some disparities between the city of New London and the rest of the L&M service area. In particular, there is a larger black and Hispanic population in the city, a higher poverty rate, and lower levels of education. Maxwell said these demographics can have an effect on the health rates, saying those in poverty are more likely to experience obesity.

Russell Melmed, an epidemiologist with the Ledge Light Health District, said the lead causes of death in New London County are related to cardiovascular issues or cancer. He said there is a disparity in these numbers, with black and Hispanic residents experiencing higher mortality rates in most causes of death.

“This is egregious. This is unacceptable. This is unjust,” said Melmed. “There’s no reason blacks and Hispanics should be dying at greater rates than whites.”

Maxwell said that the number of New London County residents with access to health insurance compares favorably to state and national rates, there are still some issues with health care access. She said a survey of 26 local health and human service professionals as well as community leaders identified issues with finances or transportation, language or cultural barriers, and a lack of awareness of resources as problems related to health. The survey also identified a need for access to primary and specialty care providers, free or low cost health care options, access to food and exercise programs, outreach efforts by health providers, and bilingual staff and programs.

Melmed said there are high rates of emergency room visits in the county but that the comparative hospitalization rate is lower. He said residents are using the hospital for problems such as asthma, which he said should be treated at home.

Dr. Nicholas Fischer, superintendent of the New London Public Schools, said the study should make an effort to distinguish between race and poverty in identifying health impacts. He also said the issue of access relates to residents having limited resources.

“I don’t care where you are in the country, the main reason people go to the emergency room is they can’t afford a doctor,” he said.

The study also made the following conclusions:

  • Certain cancer rates were higher in New London County than the state and national averages between 2004 and 2008 including breast cancer, female colorectal cancer, and lung cancer. However, the rate of prostate cancer was the lower than state and national averages
  • Diabetes cases per 1,000 people increased from 27.4 in 2008 to 33.7 in 2010, well above the goal of 7.2 set by Healthy People 2020
  • Asthma rates declined between 2008 and 2010 but remained above the Healthy People 2020 goals, with 234.4 cases per 100,000 people in the 0-4 age group in the L&M service area
  • Chlamydia rates were high but below the state and national average in 2008, with 245.4 cases per 100,000 people in the L&M primary service area

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !