.
Feedback

How Much Open Space Has Connecticut Preserved?

That's a great question, and the answer is, no one knows.

For at least 20 years, the state of Connecticut has wanted to preserve undeveloped land. It has bought some properties and helped towns and land trusts to buy land. The state officially has a goal of keeping 21 percent of its land undeveloped, and it wants to meet this goal in only 12 years. The clock is ticking – so how well are we doing?

Would you believe that no one knows?

And because no one knows, the General Assembly was considering Senate Bill 829, which calls for spending a half million dollars to pay the University of Connecticut’s Center for Land Use Education and Research to come up with an accurate database that can be brought up to date easily. The bill made it out of committee but then was left out of the appropriations package, and so is effectively dead in this legislative session.

A year ago, then-Gov. M. Jodi Rell announced that the state was 77 percent of the way there. But with the potential for thousands of protected acres in towns unreported, it’s natural to wonder if perhaps the state is doing better than this.

The state Department of Environmental Protection was last able to answer the question, “How much land is protected?” in 1997.

The DEP began work on updating those maps several years ago, but the project, called Protected Open Space Mapping or POSM, doesn’t include much of eastern Connecticut, especially along the coast. For now, POSM has halted for lack of funding.

“POSM is playing opossum,” said Sandy Breslin, director of government relations for Audubon Connecticut, an organization that favors the bill to establish an inventory.

Breslin, in a phone interview, said that saving land is not just for views and human recreation. “The wildlife that depends on open space for its survival doesn’t know town boundaries,” she said, “and they don’t know the difference between federal and state and municipal land.”

Breslin said that knowing how much land all of Connecticut’s municipalities have protected is vital to the state’s ability to take control of protecting green corridors of land.

Open space has long been a big part of how towns plan for the future. The Council on Environmental Quality scolded the state for its lack of knowledge in its recently released annual report. “We have a goal set in state law on how much land should be permanently protected for the future,” said the CEQ Executive Director Karl Wagener, “and it seems a major gap, or deficiency, that we don’t really know how much we have.”

Wagener said that the whole state ought to be able to plan for which land needs preserving as well as the recently released Highlands project report, a multi-state, quasi-government effort to protect a green swath from the Middle Atlantic States along the spine of the Appalachian Mountains, swinging through Connecticut’s northwest corner.

To get a sense of just how far the state has to go with this information, try viewing the data already placed on maps. Go to this site: http://ctecoapp1.uconn.edu/simpleviewer/ezviewer.htm. On the left side of the page, scroll down to “Open Space.” Then click on “Protected Open Space Mapping.” The map on the right will automatically load.

Zooming in on coastal and eastern Connecticut shows no data on this map because, Wagener said, POSM did not complete its work in many of those towns.

Data from 1997 can be viewed by clicking on “1997 Municipal and Private Open Space” on the left side of the page. The map at right will show properties in various colors, designating parks, forests, preserves, and school property.

Based on these maps, then, the state:

  • Knows about (acquired a half century ago) but does not know about the 77-acre Summer Hill property in North Madison, near Hammonasset Reservoir, acquired just this year.
  • Knows about Bluff Point Coastal Reserve and Haley Farm State Park in Groton, but not about the 76-acre Merritt Family Forest, acquired in 2008.
  • Does not know about hundreds of acres (out of 2,500 total) preserved by the Avalonia Land Conservation Trust in Groton, Ledyard, Stonington, North Stonington, Griswold, Preston, and Voluntown.
  • Knows about in Waterford but not about acreage set aside as open land in subdivisions since regulations added that provision decades ago.

 It seemed that it might be easy for a smart person to gather the lists of protected land from a town. But it’s not. Most towns have that information, but not in one place. Since not all land that has been protected from development is open to the public, an inventory is not the simple matter of making a list of public parks and nature preserves.

One town clerk told me I was welcome to come down there and do research in the land records, but that she wasn’t sure who might have a list.

 Links:

Clinton Land Trust

Madison

Avalonia Land Conservancy

Montville Conservation Commission

Waterford Conservation Commission

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !