.
Feedback

Daily Five: Dissecting an Expensive State Policy Change

Five things to know for Wednesday, Jan. 16, 2013

1. Today, a mixture of rain, snow, freezing rain and sleet is predicted before 2, according to the National Weather Service. Tonight should be partly cloudy, with a low around 30, according to the service.

2. Monday, Patch learned something new and interesting in an interview with Finance Director Rudie Beers, which seems to be the case every time we interview Beers.

Beers said in 2001, the Municipal Employees Retirement (MERF) system was actually overfunded. MERF serves municipal employees in the town of Waterford but is completely controlled by the state, and there is no municipal representation on the board that controls MERF.

MERF relies heavily on investment income to make money. The idea is employees pay a certain percentage of their salary to the fund and the town pays a certain percentage of an employee's salary in additional money to the fund, and that money is invested. If the market is strong, that means both employees and the town have to pay less. It is worth noting that MERF is a defined benefit plan compared to a defined contribution plan, which means it has to be funded to hit a certain level of promised benefit to the employee.

Anyway, as I said, in 2001 MERF was actually overfunded, thanks to a strong market bringing in a lot of investment income. At that time, fire and police employees were paying 2.25 percent of their salary into the system and the town was paying less than 4 percent of salary.

At that time, the state was so confident it would continue to gain 8 percent investment income annually, it expanded the program. Specifically, it allowed an employee to be vested in the program after five years, instead of 10 (which means they qualify for a retirement after five years of working for a municipality instead of ten), according to Beers. Also, the retirement is based off of how many years an employee works, but the state changed what it considered years worked, she said. Now, employees could count military service to that time and even unpaid positions, such as being elected to a town board, as years of service, she said.

Beers, who at that time was Stonington’s director of finance, was outraged, and said those changes would cost a tremendous amount of money. She was right.

Now, for fire and police employees, the town pays an additional 16.65 percent of salary to an employee's retirement plan, and the employee still only pays 2.25 percent. That is largely because investment income has gone from 8 percent a year to 1 percent, thanks to a poor market, Beers said. But it is also because more people qualify for the program and more years are added to people who do qualify because of the reasons stated above, she said.

Anyway, just an interesting look in how policy decisions can have long-term effects on budgets, taxes and the service level a town can offer. For more information about municipal retirements and some complaints Waterford's Board of Finance has about them, click here.

3. Tuesday, Pratt & Whitney, which is one of Connecticut’s largest employers, announced it was laying off 200 salaried employees in its Middletown and East Hartford locations. For more information, click here.   

4. Tonight there are two town meetings that are open to the public. The Youth Service Advisory Board meets at 5:30 p.m. in the Youth Services Bureau's building and the Economic Development Commissions meets at 6:30 p.m. in Town Hall.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

5. On this date in 2006, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf was sworn in as the president of Liberia, becoming Africa’s first female elected head of state. And on this date in 1919, the United States Senate ratified the 18th Amendment, which made it illegal to sell, transport or manufacture alcohol.

Quote of the Day

“The reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated.”

-Mark Twain

Trivia of the Day

On this date in 2001, President Bill Clinton awarded this former president a posthumous Medal of Honor for his service during the Spanish-American War. What former president was it?

Yesterday’s Answer: James Naismith first published the rules of basketball in 1892, and is credited for inventing the sport.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !