.
Feedback

Salem, Kobyluck At Odds Again

Town Demands Lawsuit Be Dismissed; What This Means To 28 Industrial Drive Application

On Valentine’s Day, Salem Town Planner Mary Ann Chinatti’s instincts told her to take Rattlesnake Ledge Road on her way into work. Kobyluck Brothers LLC has a quarry there, although its special permit to continue work on the site expired in October 2010.

Driving by, Chinatti saw several machines excavating stone and several trucks hauling it away. She took pictures, then went back the next two days, and continued to shoot pictures of the work.

“They were going full-bore,” Chinatti said. “Full-bore.”

On behalf of the town, attorney Steven Byrne filed a motion to dismiss Kobyluck’s pending lawsuit against the town. Included were the pictures of the men working.

“The plaintiffs have conducted earth excavation activities at their quarry without the benefit of a special permit,” Byrne wrote. “From their actions, it is clear the plaintiffs believe they can ignore the zoning regulations, in particular cease and desist orders, and act above the law.”

In June 2010, Kobyluck’s special permit to continue quarrying on Rattlesnake Ledge was approved by Salem Planning and Zoning Commission, but with strict stipulations, including a $253,000 bond for restoration. The Waterford-based company sued the town, saying the stipulations were unfair and unjust.

Kobyluck did not agree to conditions, and in October 2010, its previous special permit for the work expired. However, Kobyluck LLC will continue to work on the property, owner Matt Kobyluck said.

“We are going to do what we have to do to run our business,” he said. “I have employees I have to pay, I have a mortgage on the property; I need to keep that going.”

Kobyluck and his lawyers have argued that since the new special permit was illegal, the previous permit should still be in existence.

“Generally when you appeal the conditions stay the way they were,” he said. “And in this case we had a permit before we appealed.”

The town of Salem is asking the court to dismiss Kobyluck’s claim.

Background In Salem

Kobyluck LLC has been working in Salem since 2002, quarrying and processing stone. Neighbors began to complain in 2005, saying the company was working more hours and using more equipment, namely stone processors, than what was agreed upon.

The town and Kobyluck could not agree on a settlement, sending the issue to court. In 2008, the court agreed with the town, ordering a cease and desist order.

Kobyluck followed the stipulations of the cease and desist order by removing extra equipment and restoring land it wasn’t supposed to disturb. It also paid damages to the town, and was allowed to restart its business for the time being.

Waterford Application

Last year, Kobyluck submitted an application to quarry and process stone at 28 Industrial Drive in Waterford. The application went to a public hearing, held by the Conservation Commission.

, many residents and both Waterford legislators, State Rep. Betsy Ritter and State Sen. Andrea Stillman, spoke against the application. They brought up Kobyluck’s issues in Salem, as well as its issues in Montville, where the Department of Environmental Protection and then-Attorney General Blumenthal fined it $100,000.

Kobyluck eventually , saying it needed more time to complete several questions asked by the Conservation Commission. The company, which employs around 100 people in the area, will reapply within the next couple of months, Matt Kobyluck said.

Previous problems in Montville and Salem will not play a large role in deciding if a quarry should allowed, Conservation Commission Chairman Gary Johnson and Town Planner Tom Wagner said. The focus of the commission and staff will be on the new application, they both said.

“I’m more worried about the exact usage and all the potential issues that come with this kind of facility,” Wagner said. “That is what I will be advising the commission on.”

Johnson echoed that thought.

“We have to look at every application on its own merits,” he said. “I don’t hold (their previous problems) against them.”

Kobyluck agreed.

“I don’t really think the (application in Waterford and what happened in Salem and Montville) have anything to do with each other,” he said.

Kobyluck added that the area he is looking to build in is zoned industrial, and has been zoned industrial for a long time. Industrial zones have to end somewhere, and normally they end at residential zones; but that doesn’t mean a company shouldn’t be allowed to build there, he said.

“A lot of people take it personal, and that’s unfortunate,” Kobyluck said. “Because it isn’t personal. It is about business.”

Kobyluck said he feels confident that the quarry will eventually be allowed.

“It will be a long, drawn-out process,” he said. “But I think it will eventually work out.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 22, 2013 at 06:57 pm
That's wonderful Naty! If we can get enough people like yourself, who care, we really might be ableRead More to save Cohanzie!
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !