.

Millstone Looking To Vastly Increase Its Nuclear Waste Capacity

Because a national repository remains a broken promise, Millstone is looking to increase its number of dry cask storage units for nuclear waste from 19 up to 135.

Thanks to the continuing non-action by the federal government, Dominion is taking steps to drastically increase the amount of nuclear waste it can store at .

Millstone, as of now, has 19 dry cask storage units to hold nuclear waste, and 18 of them are filled. Dominion, owners of Millstone, will ask the Connecticut Siting Council if they can pour a cement pad capable of holding 135 dry cask storage units, enough to handle almost all the nuclear waste the site will produce until 2045, when the last license for the nuclear power plant expires.

Dominion maintains this is something they should have never had to build, as the federal government promised it would build a . But no repository exists, and likely won’t for awhile, forcing all 104 nuclear power plants across the country to store their own nuclear waste on-site.

“The federal government has a responsibility to take this fuel, and they are not living up to that responsibility,” Millstone spokesman Ken Holt said. “We don’t want to be in the long-term storage business.”

The Town of Waterford and the Town of East Lyme are holding an informational meeting on August 15 in the Waterford Town Hall Auditorium that is open to the public. The point is to give the public as much information as possible directly from Dominion, Waterford First Selectman Dan Steward said.

“This is so people know what is happening,” Steward said. “Let Dominion tell (the public) directly.”

What Millstone Is Doing

Every time one of the units at Millstone is refueled, which is every 18 months, one-third of the nuclear material is taken out and replaced with new nuclear material. The old material, which is now nuclear waste, needs to be stored in a safe place, as it is still radioactive.

Millstone has been storing this waste since its inception in 1970 in spent fuel pools. Spent fuel pools are basically just large pools within the unit, where the waste is kept 20 feet below water to keep it cool and to avoid it from reacting.

The problem is, those pools are starting to fill up, so Dominion requested to build dry cast storage units to hold the fuel. These storage containers are outside of the reactors, and use a passive air system to keep the nuclear waste cool. Only nuclear waste that has sat in the spent fuel pools for five years can be moved to dry cask storage, Holt said.

Dominion secured approval to build 49 units dry caste storage units at Millstone from the Connecticut Siting Council, and was allowed to do the “underground work” for a concrete pad that would hold 135 units. In 2003, Millstone built 19 such units on top of a 173-foot long, 28-foot wide concrete pad, and has since filled 18 with nuclear waste from Unit 2.

Now Millstone wants to extend that concrete pad to hold up to 135 units, Holt said. Again, the Connecticut Siding Council already approved and Dominion has already completed the “underground” work of such a pad about 10 years ago, and this will just be pouring the concrete for the pad, he said.

Millstone will not build all 135 dry cask storage units at the same time, instead building them over time as they are needed, Holt said. Holt refused to comment on the cost of the project, although said it would be millions of dollars.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission is okay with the plan, NRC Spokesman Neil Sheehan said. Sheehan said both dry cask storage and spent fuel pools are considered equally effective ways to store nuclear waste.

The pad will increase Millstone's assessed value, Waterford Tax Assessor Mike Bekech said. Bekech said he could not comment on exactly how much it would increase the value.

Yucca Mountain

While dry cask storage is a safe way to store the nuclear waste, the real answer is a nuclear repository, Holt said. Steward and East Lyme First Selectman Paul Formica both agreed.

“We need to solve the problem with what to do with the waste,” Formica said. “To me, it makes sense to have a central storage system.”

The federal government spent billions of dollars to turn Yucca Mountain in Nevada into that repository, but the Obama administration has since cancelled those plans. Additionally, plans to recycle nuclear waste – a method used in France – have been put on hold since the Carter Administration in the 1970s, Sheehan said.

That leaves no long-term solution on the horizon, Holt said. That means storing the nuclear waste from Millstone is up to Dominion, although the company has proven itself to handle such a job, Formica said.

“I certainly find Dominion a very capable company,” he said. “They’ve demonstrated through the operations of the plant that those of us who live by are justified to have confidence in them.”

cancer rates are up there! August 05, 2012 at 04:02 PM
Safe, you think? I got my cancer in 1970, rare form for a child so young, there was a cluster of children in Waterford at that particular time. Seems I was the only one to survive according to a teacher who saw each of us kids since we were ill and missed a lot of schooling. The idea that the RODs were transported through our neighborhoods and possibly exposed the children when they brought them to the plant makes sense. Sorry, I know a lot of people who work at Millstone, but I still have concerns for the children who live in town.
ZIGGY August 06, 2012 at 07:17 AM
tax em on the storage
SAMarshall August 16, 2012 at 05:28 PM
@Maureen RE: Cancer rates up there. Sorry, but you don't know what you are talking about. I know they are safe. You talk about poaaibly getting cancer from rods as they were brought TO the plant. That is 100% impossible. If they were bringing fuel TO the plant, it was not put into the reactor yet, which means that you can (and I have) hold it in your hands with absolutely no radiation dose. Also, all known studies show no known risk from cancer from Nuclear power plants.
SAMarshall August 16, 2012 at 05:32 PM
The nuclear industry is already taxed on the storage of this fuel. In fact, the industry has paid over $30 Billion to the US govt. to finance the storage of the waste. Since the govt. has done nothing with it, the industry now gets to sue the govt. and get back some of that money so that they can build these dry storage sites.
xsailor8 September 05, 2012 at 06:09 PM
Would be more comfortable with this if dominion could actually prove by a physical demonstration that they could move hot material from one cask into another one in the event that a cask became defective.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »