.
Feedback

Lawrence & Memorial Plans Major Capital Expenditures For 2013

Speakers at annual meeting say hospital is working to adapt to changing health care situation

Sometimes you have to spend money to make money. It’s a maxim Lawrence & Memorial Hospital is hoping holds true as it plans to more than double its expenditures on capital projects in its next fiscal year.

At the annual meeting of the Lawrence & Memorial Corporation on Wednesday, L&M Finance Committee Chairman Fred Conti said the New London hospital had a number of successes in the 2012 fiscal year, which ended on Sept. 30. However, he said a number of challenges have also affected the finances.

“2012 was a hectic year,” said Conti. “It’s been a blur with so many things going on and some great accomplishments, and a few disappointments,” he said.

L&M saw a total of 480,577 patients during the fiscal year period. In that time, the hospital and its affiliates expended $327,591,000 while collecting $340,556,000 in revenue. Conti said the operating gain of $12,965,000—which is used to finance ongoing developments—was less than expected due to factors such as drug costs, the increased cost of transitioning medical records to an electronic format, and reduced revenue due to a reclassification of patients admitted and kept for observation.

During the fiscal year, the corporation spent $34.6 million on capital projects including $13.5 million for routine equipment upgrades, $7.2 million for a Dana Farber cancer center being built in Waterford with an expected opening date in the fall of 2013, and $2.6 million for the purchase of a Howard Street building in New London that will house 60 exam rooms. In 2013, the corporation expects to spend $79.4 million on capital projects including $23 million on the cancer center, $21.5 million toward the acquisition of the Westerly Hospital assets, $12 million for equipment upgrades, and $6.9 million for renovations at the Howard Street building.

Bruce Cummings, the L&M president and CEO, said health care is changing from fee-for-service care to value-based payments. He said the corporation’s investment in facilities such as the cancer center reflect a shift in patient numbers, with more people requiring outpatient care than inpatient care.

“This is our new imperative, to adapt,” he said. “We’re all Darwinians in health care now.”

Ulysses Hammond, director of the L&M Board of Directors, said the increasing demand for services against decreasing state and federal assistance represents a “perfect storm” for health care. He said the corporation’s governance is being adjusted to decrease the size of the board of directors and streamlining committees to avoid duplication of effort.

“Although our current governance model has served this organization well for many years, we recognize that the future will increasingly be turbulent for health care providers,” said Hammond. “Payments will continue to shrink. Regulations will only increase in number and complexity. And incentives from insurers, both public and private, will increasingly favor results, or value, over volume.”

Cummings said the hospital’s model calls for funds from private insurers to cover any losses incurred through uninsured patients or patients on Medicare or Medicaid. However, he said that without an increase in Medicare the hospital’s operating margin will drop from a current goal of three percent to a level where revenues will be 4.5 percent below expenditures by 2017.

Cummings said several efforts aim to generate revenue to stave off such a deficit. These include the cancer center, the $69 million bid to acquire the assets of Westerly Hospital, and increasing surgical staff. Cummings said estimates have these investments reducing but not eliminating the projected 2017 deficit, and the corporation is looking for internal savings and other means of revenue as well.

L&M has already made some sacrifices in the past year due to financial difficulties. In June, the hospital discontinued its sports medicine program after determining that it was no longer sustainable. Last month, the hospital laid off 22 employees to close a $3.2 million budget gap in the current fiscal year.

However, speakers at the meeting identified a number of achievements in the prior year as well. Hammond said these included plans for an Old Lyme outpatient facility and renovations to the hospital’s lobby, clinical design unit, and a patient unit.

“Now on with the second century,” he said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !