.
Feedback

As a State Cut Looms, Seaside Remains Vacant [VIDEO]

Gov. Dannel Malloy is proposing to cut $373k in payment-in-lieu-of-taxes (PILOT) funding for Seaside Sanitarium, while there are still no plans to develop the property at 36 Shore Road.

In August of 2011, developer Mark Steiner got several zoning regulations changed in the district that covers Seaside Sanitarium. At that time, he said he should have plans for Seaside in to the town by the end of August 2012, at the latest.

Now, it is February of 2013, and there is still no plan before the Waterford Planning and Zoning Commission. Steiner had a pre-application meeting this past summer where he discussed rebuilding the existing buildings into 50 high-end condos and constructing 72 single-family homes on the property, but hasn’t talked with the town’s planning staff since.

And now, Gov. Dannel Malloy is funding the state gives the town each year. While First Selectman Dan Steward correctly points out more state funding in other areas will balance out the difference, it also means that if Steiner does buy the property the town will have more to gain financially.

There are many obstacles facing Steiner. Below, we detail each one, and give further detail on the potential of lost PILOT funding and why he has yet to buy the property.

The Challenges/Explanations

Jacques Suit

Kathleen and Alan Jacques, two neighbors of Seaside who have opposed Steiner’s vision for the property, have filed a lawsuit appealing a decision by the Planning and Zoning Commission to change some of the regulations in the zoning district in 2011. That lawsuit is still ongoing.

If the Jacques win that lawsuit, the zoning regulations at Seaside will change and it will impact what is allowed in that zone.

Steiner’s Pre-Application Meeting

This summer, Steiner met with the Planning and Zoning Commission to discuss his vision for the property in a pre-application meeting. There, he outlined his hopes to rebuild the existing buildings into 50 high-end condos along with constructing approximately 72 single-family homes on the property.

Wednesday, Waterford Planning Director Tom Wagner said Steiner would need to change the zoning regulations in the district to allow for that proposal. Wagner said he has heard nothing from Steiner since that meeting.

Alleged Steiner Financial Issues

In the past few years, court records show a bank began the foreclosure process on Steiner’s home and several other companies took him to court over unpaid bills. However, court records show those cases have been settled in November of 2012.

Why Steiner Hasn’t Bought the Property Yet

In May of 2011, the state reached a tentative agreement to sell Seaside to Steiner for $8 million. However, the state has not yet sold the property to Steiner because the sale is contingent on Steiner getting town approval on his buildings plans, according to a previous interview with Jeffrey Beckham, the Director of Communications for the Connecticut Department of Administrative Services.

PILOT Funding

The state paid Waterford $373,493 in PILOT funds this year for the property. Now, Malloy is proposing to cut that funding, while increasing state funding in other areas to Waterford so the overall state aid to the town stays flat.

If approved, it means the town will be collecting no money from the parcel. If Steiner buys the property, the town will begin to collect property taxes from him.

According to Waterford Assessor’s online database, Seaside has an assessed value of $33,989,030. At the current mill rate of 19.77, the town would have collected $671,962.53 in taxes this year from the property as it sits today. If it was developed and the value increased, so would that figure.

A Tuesday voicemail to Steiner from Patch was not returned.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !