.
Feedback

Buscetto V. St. Bernard

Fired Saint athletic director seeks damages on many counts from regional school

When Saint Bernard School fired Bill Buscetto June 17 after his three-plus tremendously successful years as athletic director and baseball coach, the shocking news screamed for an explanation.

Now we won't be left searching for answers. Buscetto's dismissal will be reviewed, dissected and analyzed by an impartial third party in a court of law.

Buscetto, 39, has filed suit against St. Bernard and the Norwich Diocese for wrongful termination. The former Saint athletic standout, Hall of Famer, and acclaimed coach, athletic director and fundraiser in his three-year professional Saint tenure is seeking retribution for loss of income, benefits, reputation damages and money he personally contributed to athletic facility upgrades.

Who He Is

Anyone familiar with Buscetto knew this intensely prideful and dynamic man would not take his jolting separation quietly. Not when he has what he views as an excellent "case" against his alma mater. Buscetto was replaced as athletic director by Brendan Case, a 27-year-old former Ledyard school teacher who was St. Bernard tennis coach last spring.

"I cannot wait for my day in court," Buscetto said. "I have always viewed this as a bogus termination, a personality conflict (with outgoing headmaster) William McKenna. The school has left me with no other alternative that to file suit, which is the last thing I wanted to do, because I love Saint Bernard. I bleed red and gray. I want everyone to know that the lawsuit has nothing to do with how much I love the teachers, coaches and students I've know there."

The lawsuit chronicles a couple of incidents that Buscetto feels contributed to some administrators frustration with him, justified or not.

Misusing Funds

Buscetto, a proven fundraiser with years of experience as former director of the Stonington Community Center, organized a St. Bernard golf fundraiser in 2009 and 2010 and raised $25,000 earmarked for school athletic projects.

The suit claims he was only allowed to use $5,000 for athletics, because school administrators allotted the remaining funds for business, payroll and non-sport expenses. Upon learning this, Buscetto cancelled the golf outing. In the suit, he lists he charged the school had misappropriated of funds.

Based partially on the school's hesitance to fund athletic projects, Buscetto donated $70,000 of his own money to turn a grassy pasture at school into Saint Bernard's first on-campus softball complex last spring. The suit is seeking repayment of the $70,000, among other damages.

Buscetto claims the final straw behind his dismissal was what he viewed to be a responsible reaction to an incident during a Saint football conditioning session on school grounds June 16, a time allowable  for training under CIAC rules.

See No Evil, Hear No Evil?

An assistant coach was starting conditioning drills when a Saint Bernard employee interrupted practice and told the team, per orders of McKenna, he said, to get off school grounds. The assistant called head coach Scott Cook, who was at his daughter's school ceremony, who asked the employee to contact McKenna. The employee refused.

The assistant stated in an email to Buscetto that he smelled alcohol on the employee and suspected he was intoxicated by his slurred speech and body language.

Buscetto reported the incident to administrators and advised the football staff to call police if this or any employee was suspected to be interfering with conditioning or suspected to be intoxicated. Cook emailed Buscetto, thanking him for his direction.

"Incredibly, the Norwich Diocese superintendent (Jack Shine) admonished me for reporting this incident," Buscetto said. "He told me I'm not supposed to report such an incident about a school employee. Twenty seven hours after that incident, I was called into the office and fired."

After many public protests to his dismissal by athletes, alumni, coaches and fellow athletic directors in the area, Saint Bernard offered him half of his job back - the AD post with no coaching.  It was an offer that Buscetto, who coached the baseball team to a Class S state final in his first year in 2009 and to within one inning of winning the ECC Title in 2011, refused.

"It's like 1,000 against one," Buscetto said. "I received incredible support from so many people who wanted me reinstated. I'm very eager to have my case heard."

New Guys

In his place, a 27-year-old with no administrative experience is the AD and a 22-year-old just out of college is the baseball coach.

Perhaps some day, with years of hard work and proven credentials, these current Saint leaders can match be mentioned in the same sentence as Buscetto. But let's not pretend Saint Bernard is better off now that it was behind the passionate leadership of Buscetto.

In a letter on the school's website, Thomas Doherty, SB's new headmaster, alerted parents and alumni about Buscetto's lawsuit and stated "it has no merit."

Any impartial third party will tell you that is wrong. And we suspect an impartial third party will find Saint Bernard wrong for firing Buscetto.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !