.
Feedback

A Vote of Confidence

Waterford Board of Education extends school Superintendent Jerome Belair’s contract for another three years

Waterford School Superintendent Jerome Belair received a big vote of confidence from the Board of Education at last night’s special meeting. The board unanimously approved extending Belair’s contract for another three years, from July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2014.

“We are happy with the performance,” said Board of Education Chair Donald Blevins. “I don’t think any of us have any doubts.”

Belair was hired by the board to replace Randall Collins, who retired in December after serving as Waterford Superintendent for 20 years. Almost instantly, the former Weston superintendent confronted a number of challenges, not least of which was a budget that required teacher layoffs for the first time in recent memory.  

Belair’s hiring agreement called for his contract to be renegotiated in the summer but the new contract remains the same in terms of salary and benefits, Blevins said.

Although the bulk of the Board of Education’s July 21 meeting was dedicated to personnel matters and was therefore held in executive session, board members were eager to discuss their ideas for the school system going forward.

Sheri Cote proposed that the board create a finance committee to help members focus on specific line items within the school budget. Board members agreed that they weren’t interested in micromanaging the budget, but many felt they might be able to offer the superintendent more support at budget hearings if they had a firmer grasp of the details.

When it comes to budgets, the devil is often in the details. For instance, Belair pointed out that the latest fiscal year ended with a $175,000 deficit in fuel expenditures. That wasn’t because the schools burned more oil than usual, but the budget created by the Finance Committee set the price for oil at $2.04 per gallon, when actual costs ranged from $2.18 to $3.31. The new budget guideline for oil is $2.44, Belair added.

Board member Kathleen M. McCarty said she would like to see a renewed focus on the Learning through Service program. The Waterford School District was among the first in the nation to make community service a requirement for graduation more than a decade ago. Today, Waterford High School students commit 20,000 hours to community service but the job of running the program has been reduced from a full-time to a part-time position.

McCarty would like to see that position restored to full time. The Board agreed that it was time to take a look at how the program operates with an eye to reinforcing connections to curriculum and career development opportunities.

McCarty also suggested the board be more aggressive about developing public private partnerships. There was much discussion about what form corporate sponsorship might take.Corporate sponsors for scoreboards or banners at games or shows seemed a more palatable solution than, say, renaming the marching band after an insurance company.  

Board members were also interested in finding out exactly how much the schools might charge for advertising banners at school events. “If I’m going to sell my soul, I’m going to get a good price for it,” said Blevins.

In the end, however, board members agreed that it was important to try to find some way to enhance the budget. “It’s a shame to lose programs if we have a way to save them,” said McCarty.  

The final discussion focused on how to improve communication between the Board of Education and parents, teachers, and students. One proposal was to take surveys designed to assess the climate of the culture, asking questions about how people feel about school safety, activities, classes, and special programs.

Board members also favored moving some of their meetings from the Board of Education conference room to the schools. Board members said they’d welcome the opportunity to explore some of the new school buildings and some thought it might increase attendance by parents and students. As no member of the public attended the special meeting (which, by the way, was held at LEARN in Old Lyme) it probably couldn’t hurt to try.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !