.
Feedback

Why Retirement Costs Are Up Over 40% In FY2012

Sheehan Breaks It Down

The largest single budget increase for FY2012 is the 40.35% increase in the Retirement Commission Budget.   Because Waterford is one of the eighty five Towns in Connecticut that are part of the Municipal Employees Retirement System (MERS), the Town has no control over the amount it is required to contribute to the Municipal Employees Retirement Fund (MERF).  The FY2012 funding requirement for MERF is $2,901,840. 

Besides the contributions to the MERF, the Town also supports twenty two persons who retired prior to the Town joining the MERS in 1987 and are members of the town’s Public Employees Retirement System (PERS).  The funding requirement for the PERS in FY2012 is $82,885. 

The employee contribution to the MERF is set by state statute at 2.25% for an employee who also contributes to Social Security.  The Town contribution changes annually as determined by the State Retirement Commission, a body inside the State Comptroller’s Office that was established by the State Legislature.  The MERS has been around since the 1950s but Waterford did not elect to participate until 1987.  The Town contribution requirement in 1987 was 7.07% for regular employees and 9.29% for Police and Fire Service Employees.  Between 2000 and 2002 the required contribution was as low as 2.75% for regular employees and 3.75% for Police and Fire Service employees.  Starting in 2004 the contribution requirement started to rise slowly to 7.00% for regular employees and 8.00% for Police and Fire Service employees in 2007.  Within the last two years the percent of payroll costs have risen 4.46% for regular employees and 8.37% for Police and Fire Service Employees to 11.56% and 16.37% respectively.  Waterford currently has 355 active participants and 224 retirees in the MERS.

Because of the significant increase in the percentage contribution required by the State Retirement Commission the Waterford Board of Finance (BOF) at its February 2011 meeting voted to send a to the local State Legislators and to the Chairs of the Legislature’s Labor and Public Employee Committee asking the legislature to pass proposed legislation to amend the Connecticut General Statutes to increase the employee contributions by 1% annually over the next three years to a total contribution of 5.25% and also support any proposed legislation that would permit a tiered benefit plan by grandfathering existing employees and offering a different plan with fewer benefits to new hires similar to the State of Connecticut Retirement Plan.

It is important to note, according to the Retirement Commission backup, that “The past service accrued liability for all participants in MERF B except police has been paid.  That liability is being amortized over 30 years….We are also making amortization payments to MERF B for military service purchased by participants.”  For FY2012 the police amortization is $420,790 and the Military Service Amortization is $14,782.

This is the first year that the State Retirement Commission informed the cities and towns in the system of the next fiscal year increase in time to appear in that fiscal year’s budget.  According to the Retirement Commission backup material for the FY2012 budget, “the estimated FY11 unbudgeted liability for pension is estimated to be in the area of $437,000.”   The Waterford Board of Finance (BOF) will probably be considering that additional appropriation at its May 2011 meeting so that the RTM will be able to approve the appropriation at its June 2011 meeting.

Although the State Retirement Commission is responsible for the administration of MERS, the State Treasurer is responsible for investing MERS funds for the exclusive benefit of MERS members.  As of December 31, 2010 the MERF fund had a balance of around $1.6 Billion and had an increase of 0.7% over the past three years.  According to the Retirement Commission letter to the Director of Finance “….The sizable increase in the contribution rate was primarily due to the continued recognition of a portion of the Fund’s significant investment losses that occurred in 2008.”  The employee contribution is fixed at 2.25% by Connecticut State Statute.

Employee retirement eligibility and benefits are set by state statute.  To be eligible for retirement, the employee must have attained the age of 55 with at least 5 years of continuous active service or 15 years of non-continuous active service with a MERS participating municipality.  If the employee has not attained the age of 55, an employee must have a total of 25 years of service, inclusive of aggregate service, consisting of at least 5 years of continuous active service or 15 years of non continuous active service with a MERS participating community.  An early retirement will result in an actuarially reduced retirement benefit.

The actual retirement benefit is determined by 1) Years and months of Service Credit in MERS; 2) The employees Final Average Pay (the average of pay for the three highest paid years of municipal service); and 3)  The earnings breakpoint for members covered by Social Security.  For clarification, pay means the annual salary, including overtime, temporary Workers’ Compensation payments, and the value of any food, lodging, fuel, or laundry provided by the town.  Pay excludes fees or allowances for expenses and any lump sum reimbursement for accrued sick and vacation time.

If an employee retires before age 62, the retirement benefit is 2% x Final Average Pay x Years of Service.  Upon reaching age 62 or if the employee retires after attaining age 62 then the basic annual retirement benefit calculation is a two step process.  1.5% x Final Average Pay up to the Year’s breakpoint x Years of Service plus 2.0% x Final Average Pay above the Year’s breakpoint x Years of Service.  According to the Connecticut Municipal Employees Retirement System Summary Plan Description, the 2011 break point is $58,100 and the 2012 breakpoint is $61,600.  Breakpoints increase annually 6% rounded to the nearest one hundred dollars.

 Retirement benefits are adjusted annually to offset rising costs of living starting  on the July 1st following the annuitant’s retirement date.  COLA for non-disability retirement is determined at 60% of the annual increase in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W) up to 6% plus 75% of the annual increase in the CPI-W above 6%.

A quick sample calculation for an employee with 25 years of service and a Final Average Pay of $50,000, the retirement pay prior to reaching age 62 would be $25,000 per year and after age 62 would be $18,750 per year.  I will leave it to the reader to decide if that is a living retirement pension.

Much of the information for this article was derived from information on the CMERS website http://www.osc.state.ct.us/rbsd/cmers and associated pages and from the Waterford Retirement Commission FY2012 backup material.

 

 

 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !