.
Feedback

Town Proposing 6.29 Percent Increase In Sewer Rates

The actual increase will depend on water consumption, as the consumption rate is being increased by 10 percent while the annual fee stays flat.

At their last meeting, the Utility Commission unanimously voted to increase the consumption charge to Waterford ratepayers by 10 percent, meaning a 6.29 percent increase to the average ratepayer.

Waterford residents, or at least residents who don’t have wells, pay their water bills to New London. The Waterford Utility Commission is in control of the cost of sewer rates, and if the move is approved by the Representative Town Meeting it will increase consumption costs 10 percent, from $3.50 per 100 cubic feet of water used to $3.85 per 100 cubic feet of water used, according to the commission’s August 21st meeting minutes.

The actual cost to consumers depends on how much water a consumer uses. All town sewer bills are broken into two parts, a set fee based on the size of a consumer’s home or business and a consumption fee. The set fee is staying flat in this proposal, and the consumption fee is increasing by 10 percent.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

A public hearing will be held on the proposal on Tuesday at 6 p.m. in the Town Hall auditorium, according to the Utility Commission’s August 21st meeting minutes. This is the first proposal to raise sewer rates in three years, according to meeting minutes.

Full Story

There are two parts to a Waterford sewer bill. The first part is a set cost based on the size of the building, which is measured in equivalent dwelling units (EDUs). Most homes in Waterford are charged for one EDU, which costs $180 per year regardless of how much water that home uses. That charge will not change under this proposal.

The second part of the sewer bill is based off of how much water a consumer uses, and thereby goes down the drain and needs to go to the sewer treatment plant. Right now, for every 758 gallons of water a person uses, they pay $3.50, and under the proposal people will pay 10 percent more, or $3.85 for the same amount.

The actual rate increase will depend on how much water a consumer uses. However, the Utility Commission assumes the average consumer uses 65,000 gallons of water per year, which would mean a 6.29 percent increase in cost.

In real dollars, if a consumer uses 65,000 gallons of water in a building being charged for one EDU (which is the average home), they now pay $480.13 per year. If this proposal were adopted, that consumer would pay $510.14 per year, or an extra $30.01.

After the public hearing on September 18, the Waterford RTM will vote on the proposed increase at their regular meeting on October 1. The largest reason the Utility Commission has to increase its costs is because the sewer treatment plant in New London increased its cost for processing sewage, Board of Finance member and Utility Commission liaison J.W. “Bill” Sheehan said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 22, 2013 at 06:57 pm
That's wonderful Naty! If we can get enough people like yourself, who care, we really might be ableRead More to save Cohanzie!
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !