Selectmen, Board of Ed Propose $81.96M Budget for 2013-14

The proposal to run Waterford's government next year is a 4.16 percent spending increase from this year’s $78.79 million total, although the taxing ramifications remain unknown as the town goes through a revaluation.

Thursday night, the Board of Selectmen finalized a $37.34 million budget proposal for the 2013-14 fiscal year, a sum that, coupled with the Board of Education’s $44.62 million plan, means the town overall is proposing a $81.96 million budget for next year.

The total represents a 4.16 percent increase, or $3.28 million more, than the town’s $78.79 million budget for this year. The amount taxes will have to be raised to support the proposal remains unknown, as the town is going through a revaluation and the grand list will not be finalized until the end of February, Waterford Finance Director Rudie Beers said.

In the proposal, the municipal government’s operating budget is increasing by more than double the Board of Education’s operating budget. First Selectman Dan Steward said the best way for him to address those increases in the future is by negotiating better union contracts.

“The best solution we have is to negotiate better in our contracts,” Steward said. “One of the first things I told (new Human Resources Director Joyce Sauchuk) was to tear them apart.”

The biggest increase in the budget proposal overall is an increase in bonding to pay for the town’s five new schools. The town will spend $1.8 million more on school bonding next year, which represents roughly half of the increase in the proposal.

The budget proposal now goes to the Board of Finance, who will review it during the month of March, and then to the Representative Town Meeting, who will finalize the budget in early May.

The Increases

The Board of Education’s $44.62 million proposal is a $423,405 increase from this year’s $44.2 million total, or a 0.96 percent increase. Meanwhile, the municipal government’s operating budget increases by $1 million, from $28.6 million to $29.6 million, or a 3.63 percent increase, in the proposal.

The largest increase for the municipal government is a $329,223 increase in insurance costs, mostly from a large increase in health insurance costs. Conversely, the Board of Education is spending $590,000 less on health insurance next year.

Steward said the best way for the town to contain its health insurance costs is to have union employees pay higher co-pays, to have them pay for a larger percentage of their health care plans and to give them the option of a health savings account. Steward said the Board of Education did that with its employees and it has contained costs.

“The Board of (Education) has basically set a pattern for all of us,” Steward said.

The other large increases in the proposal is and $106,886 more for the fire department’s budget.

The police department has 47 police officers, the same amount it had in 1984, Steward said. Most other town departments have cut employees since then, but Steward said the nature of the police department does not allow him to do that.

Instead, he said he can contain the cost of the department by negotiating a better contract with the police union. He said he will push to increase co-pays and cost-sharing of health insurance plans for police officers and try to reduce the amount of time off they get, to reduce overtime.

As mentioned, the largest increase in the budget is a $1.8 million increase in bonding to fund the construction of five new schools in town. The construction cost of those projects has already been approved by the RTM, Beers said.

CitizenWatch February 02, 2013 at 01:37 AM
Unacceptable! These people need to figure it out and cut spending. Figure it out, else stand down. Waterford needs a sequestration. You want growth, cut taxes and be business friendly.
Daniella Ruiz February 02, 2013 at 06:43 PM
just as i surmised. the property assessments drop (by a fraction), and the taxes will now need to increase to cover this and other 'untoward' expenses. my guess? the mill rate will be 'factored' and the sum total of tax burden will again fall on the lowest common denominator, the property owners.
fedspy February 02, 2013 at 06:52 PM
there is no hope in controlling expenses in the town of waterford , or any town or city in ct. , unless the taxpayer has a vote to approve the final budgets. it wont happen, to liberal and tooo much union control. no collective bargaining and tenure, do as wisconsin did, the voters became the final word.
Barb Facas March 06, 2013 at 04:48 PM
No increases, contain costs please, keep waterford an affordable place to live.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »