.
Feedback

State Lanches Investigation into Rt. 32 Massage Parlor

Last month, Patch reported Showgun Spa owner has prostitution conviction in New York.

The state has now officially launched an investigation of Showgun Spa in Uncasville, a health department spokesman said Wednesday.

“We have a pending investigation into this matter,” confirmed Department of Public Health Director of Communications William Gerrish. 

The 65-year-old woman who owns and operates Showgun Spa in the Gristmill Plaza was convicted in New York of promoting prostitution, a felony, and had her massage therapy license pulled in that state as a result, Montville Patch reported last month.

Nan Suk S. Clark, of Queens, NY, was convicted in 2006 for promoting and profiting from prostitution services in two Westchester County massage parlors, according to prosecution documents. 

Identified with the alias "Candy" by New York prosecutors, Clark, was found guilty of advancing and profiting from “prostitution activity conducted by three female employees who the defendant supervised,” according to a press release issued in 2007 by Assistant District Attorney Steven Vandervelden, Chief of the Organized Crime and Criminal Enterprise Bureau in Westchester.

Westchester County investigators and the New York City Police Department detectives raided two massage parlors after a two-month investigation where four women were found to have “engaged or offered to engage in sexual conduct with another person in return for a fee” during illegally performed massages. .Clark was not one of the four women; she was their “supervisor.”

Following being arrested and then convicted of “promoting prostitution, Clark was forced to surrender her license to practice massage in New York.

The Connecticut license question

Well before the Westchester case, Clark had already applied for and received a Connecticut license in 2001 (DOPH Lic. # 2517). That license expires in 2013.  So, two years after the New York conviction, in 2009,  Clark came to Connecticut, registered her new business with the state and opened shop on Route 32.

When a person applies for a license to practice massage therapy in Connecticut, the license is awarded by the state Department of Public Health. A number of requirements must be met before the license is granted including verification of course of study and board certification, a $375 application fee and verification from other states where one is or was licensed.

That form, to be completed by the state where the applicant has (or had) another license, incudes a section on any disciplinary action. It is unclear what, if any, information Clark provided about her conviction.  And we now know the state health department is investigating.

What Clark said

Montville Patch tried to get inside the business to get  look, but was stopped first by a locked door and then Clark, who said entry was permissible but without the camera, and then changed her mind but before closing the door,

Clark denied she was convicted of prostitution in New York and said in any event, she’s “not doing that,” referring to running a massage parlor that engages in prostitution.

What’s said about Showgun Spa online

Patch has not and will not provide links to the reviews of the services allegedly available at Showgun Spa, but a very cursory online search revealed numerous "reviews" and referrals about the type of services one can allegedly receive at the Montville location, including what’s described as a ‘happy ending’ with graphic details of sex services, including a table shower.  A number of client reviews include graphic descriptions of services beyond the so-called "happy ending."

What locals (and local officials) said

Following resident outrage that the business was featured in Patch’s business-listing directory, we launched our own investigation into Showgun Spa and the business and owner Clark.

Montville Mayor Ronald McDaniel, who also wears the hat of town Police Chief, said last month he was “unaware of any illegal activity” at Showgun Spa.

And the then-newly installed Resident State Trooper at the Montville Police, Sgt. Martin "Marti" Martinez, had been on the job for about a month and was new to Montville; he’d never even heard of the business, he said. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !