.
Feedback

Dispute May Lead To Fewer Political Signs

A dispute by candidate Mike Doyle about the removal of his political sign may mean no more political signs allowed at polling locations.

may lead to a change in the town’s zoning regulations, or perhaps no more political signs at polling locations.

Tuesday, at around 11 a.m., master moderator Cheryl Larder removed a sign by Republican state Senate candidate Mike Doyle at Waterford Town Hall. Larder removed the sign after Town Clerk Bob Nye complained it violated the town’s zoning regulations.

Doyle complained, with Nye finding the town’s zoning regulations. The regulations prohibit not just Doyle’s sign, but all political signs at Town Hall.

Doyle continued to protest, and put his sign back up, after the town told him to take it down. After some discussions with town officials, Doyle took the sign back down.

First Selectman Dan Steward, a Republican, said the town will now have to rethink its policy on political signs on town property, and said he would talk with both parties to figure out a solution. He said he would not comment on what that solution would be or on Doyle’s behavior on Tuesday.

The Story

Tuesday was the primary election across the state, and per usual, there were several political signs at Waterford Town Hall. All the political signs were for candidates who were on the primary ballot, except the largest sign of all – Doyle’s.

Doyle is running for the state Senate in the 20th District against Democrat Andrea Stillman, with the election for the race in November. Town Clerk Bob Nye complained to Larder about Doyle’s sign being up more than 60 days away from the election, and Larder took it down.

Doyle was upset with the decision, and got into a heated argument with Larder in the town registrar’s office. Doyle alleged the sign was removed for political purposes, as Larder and Nye are both Democrats, but Larder and Nye both dismissed that charge.

“It is not politically motivated,” Larder said. “I am following the regulations.”

Doyle continued to protest, and was waiving the sign outside Town Hall, which is technically within Waterford’s zoning regulations. Eventually, he put the sign back onto its stakes in the ground – now a violation of the zoning regulations – but took it down again after a discussion with town officials.

The Zoning Regulation

The regulation says political signs must be erected within 60 days “before the date on which the respective matter is to be decided.” Since Doyle’s sign was erected into the ground more than 60 days away from his election with Stillman, the signs were a violation of the town’s zoning regulations, Steward said.

However, the regulations went on to say that no political signs should be “erected on any publicly owned property, building or structure.” For years, candidates have put signs out in front of the polling locations, which are all publicly-owned properties (the three elementary schools and Town Hall), and therefore are in violation of the town’s zoning regulations.

Steward said he will work with both parties and possibly even work to rewrite the zoning regulations to find what is the best solution. He refused to speculate on what that would be.

Meanwhile, the zoning regulation specifically says a sign cannot be “erected” on town property. However, if a candidate holds a sign – like how Doyle was waiving his sign around after the town took it out of the ground – that is allowed, Steward said.

The Full Text of the Zoning Regulation

Section 21.6 (headline: Temporary Signs), letter b (headline: Political Signs)

“Advertising the name and qualifications of a duly registered candidate for public elective office or advertising opinions regarding any issue to be voted upon at a public election may be temporary erected not more than 60 days before the date on which the respective matter is to be decided and all such signs shall be removed within 72 hours after the date of election. However, no such political signs are to be erected on any publicly owned property, building or structure.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !