.
Feedback

Shellfish Commissions Crabby Over State’s Ineffectiveness

Local recreational shellfish commissions complain that the state takes too long to reopen shellfishing areas.

On July 4th, the weather was perfect, the sun was shining and everybody was looking for something to do outside. And yet there was one thing people couldn’t do, go clamming, thanks to the state’s delayed reaction to test the local waters.

If it rains, the state mandates that shellfish commissions send them water samples and sometimes even a dozen clams to make sure the water is clean. The process generally takes a week or so, but it rained heavy on June 25, and the clam beds didn’t reopen again until July 7th.

“July 4th was tough,” Waterford-East Lyme Shellfish Commission Chairman J. Patrick Kelly said. “Thirteen days later is not acceptable to us.”

Thursday night in East Lyme Town Hall, state representatives Betsy Ritter, D-Waterford, and Ed Jutila, D-East Lyme, along with State Sen. Andrea Stillman, D-Waterford, listened to complaints from the Waterford Shellfish Commission, the Waterford-East Lyme Shellfish Commission and the East Lyme Harbor Management Commission about the state’s inability to get recreational shellfishing areas reopened in a reasonable amount of time. Doug Lawson, , said Jordan Cove has been closed to shellfishers more often than it has been open this year.

“We open on April 1, and from April 1st up until July 7th, we were closed 50 days,” Lawson said. “Out of 91.”

Lawson said that was partly because of rain. But it is also because the state is no longer being responsive to the recreational shellfishing areas, and is taking up to two weeks to reopen shellfishing areas after storms.

“I understand the state has to worry about commercial areas first,” Kelly said. “But I don’t think they should neglect us.”

The Problem

Originally, if there was two inches of rain, the state would close down all the shellfishing areas and test the water to ensure runoff didn’t pollute the water, Kelly said. The process would take a week, and even if the state didn’t test the water, all the shellfishing areas would reopen automatically the eighth day, he said.

That has changed. Now the Connecticut Department of Agriculture is charged with testing the water, and the shellfishing beds are now closed after one-inch of rain instead of two. If there is two-inches of rain, the state requires 12 clams from the beds as well to test, Kelly said.

The problem is that the Department of Agriculture does not do the testing in a timely manner, Kelly said. It almost always takes more than seven days, which angers people who want to shellfish and reduces the amount of money the shellfish commissions can make, he said.

The perfect example was when there was heavy rains on June 25th, and the recreational shellfishing areas did not reopen until July 7, he said. The reason was because only certified person was in the state lab to do the testing, as everybody else was taking vacation, Kelly said.

“They need to take their vacations in the off-season, when there isn’t the demand,” Eric Kanter of the Waterford-East Lyme Shellfish Commission said. “We need the revenue, we can only make revenue during the summer time. If we don’t have revenue in the summer time, we aren’t going to be able to keep the (Niantic River) open.”

The shellfish commissions try to be self-sufficient, with all their money coming from selling permits for shellfishing. If the shellfishing areas are always closed, it makes it a tough sell, Lawson said.

“I’d like to be self-sufficient,” he said. “I don’t want to keep going back to the town asking for the money, that isn’t fun thing to do.”

Legislators Response

Stillman and Ritter said they would bring this up to the Department of Agriculture to see if they could get them to be more responsive. The group also threw out other ideas, such as having the DEEP handle the testing or using the labs at UConn-Avery Point.

Ritter said if the shellfish commissions could find others having the same problem, it would increase the chance of something getting done. She said shellfishing is a draw for tourists, and she could use that argument on the state level.

“This is an economic benefit to the area,” Ritter said. “Some of the reason people come here is they can come and (shellfish).”

Meanwhile, the shellfish commissioners asked members of the Department of Agriculture to show up, and none did. The commissioners said state legislators would be there as well, and still they didn’t show up, which bothered Stillman.

“That disturbs me,” Stillman said.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !