.
Feedback

RTM Unanimously Approves Radio Deal With NL

Agreement rests in the hands of the New London City Council

Monday night, the Representative Town Meeting unanimously approved that would allow the city to tap into the town’s new

The agreement still needs to be approved by the New London City Council. As part of the agreement, New London will pay part of the $225,000 annual maintenance fee for the system depending on the amount of radios it issues. At its current rate, New London will pay approximately $75,000 per year, although that number could change year-to-year, according to First Selectman Dan Steward.

“The way I see it, we have an addition to the family,” Police Chief Murray Pendleton said. “My perspective is this is the first of many things to come.” 

New London is forced to improve its radio network for its public safety personnel per federal mandate by January 1. Instead of building its own, the city will tap into Waterford’s new system, with New London having all its own separate channels on the system.

While some voiced concerns with the specifics of the agreement, RTM members were all happy that the town was regionalizing its services. RTM member Robert Brule said the town is paying the maintenance cost anyway, so it makes sense to bring in money from another municipality.

“We own the system, we are paying it anyway,” Brule said. “Getting our neighbor involved in this just makes sense.”

Specifics

RTM members questioned a telecommunications committee stipulated in the agreement to have equal membership from each municipality. In the agreement, it says the committee will “have oversight and advisory capacity of the network.”

RTM member William Auwood said the committee should not have oversight of the system. Instead, the power should remain with Waterford, as it is the one that built the system.

“Oversight is a big word,” Audwood said. “It has a lot of power.”

However Steward said the committee will be made up of police and fire personnel in the field, along with himself and likely New London Mayor Daryl Finizio, and it would deal mainly with technical issues. Pendleton said the power over the system will stay with Waterford.

“They are using a network,” Pendleton said. ”They haven’t bought the network, like we did. And that’s the way it shall stay.” 

RTM member Sharon Palmer asked if there was a way to settle disputes if they arise, and other RTM members asked who would pay for an upgrade to the system if it is needed or mandated. Town Attorney Rob Avena said those specifics were not laid out in the contract, but the agreement was built with “a lot of outs.”

“I see this as a work in progress,” Avena said. “There are lots of outs if a situation comes up. If it doesn’t work out, everyone can just go home.”

Steward said Waterford is close to adding another entity onto the system as well. If this agreement is approved by the City Council, both New London and Waterford would have to approve that third entity, Avena said after the meeting.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !