.
Feedback

Recycling Program: Saving Money, The Environment And Workers' Backs

New Single-Stream Recycling Program Saves Town Money, Reduces Injuries

Last year, the town spent $400,000 to go to a single-stream recycling system to save money, avoid injuries and, o yea, it was good for the environment too.

Well, it has worked.

The town has increased recycling by 70 percent since new, 96-gallon recycling containers have been distributed to every resident, according to Finance Director Rudie Beers. That also means the town should bring in another $50,000 in revenue for recycling this year, and avoid even more costs in disposing of solid wastes, she said.

The town pays $60 per ton to get rid of its solid waste, according to Public Works Director Ron Cusano. Meanwhile, it receives $5 to $40 per ton of garbage it recycles, meaning if a ton of waste is recycled instead of being thrown away, it could save the town $100, he said.

“It has been a very successful program,” Cusano said. “It has really been a smooth transition for us.”

 More Details

the public works department distributed 96-gallon recycling containers – the same size as the normal trash container – to all town residents. The new bins cost $400,000, and the town had to buy two more trucks that pick up the containers, but sold three recycling trucks, Cusano said.

“When we did it, we were looking at a 10-year payoff,” First Selectman Dan Steward said.

There were several goals of the program. The first was to encourage people to recycle more, as the 96-gallon containers are far bigger than the 15-gallon buckets the residents used to have, and the town can now recycle more products, Cusano said.

Also, because the recycling containers are now more than six times larger than the older containers, the town is picking up recyclables every other week instead of every week. That allowed the public works department to use workers normally assigned to only recycling in other areas every other week, a necessary flexibility considering the town eliminated four positions at public works for budget constraints, according to Cusano.

Another benefit has been the reduction of workforce injuries, Cusano said. Before, when somebody drove the recycling truck, they would have to separate the recyclables and pick up every container themselves by hand, he said.

“Guys would have to do that 700 times a day,” Cusano said.

Many of them would get hurt, and that would mean expensive workers’ compensation claims to the town, he said. Now, with the larger containers, everything is automated and the employees just have to drive the truck and use the mechanical arm to pick up the containers, Cusano said.

“Before, we would get workers’ compensation claims, and those claims would be long and repetitive,” Beers said. “Since we’ve had the new program, we have not had a single claim associated with picking up recyclables.”

Cusano said moral has increased as well. Before, guys hated driving the recycling truck, now they don’t mind, he said.

“I’m pretty proud of it,” Cusano said. “And the guys like it too. They weren’t sad to see recycling in the old trucks go. To go automated, it is a good job. And it has been working out for the town.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 22, 2013 at 06:57 pm
That's wonderful Naty! If we can get enough people like yourself, who care, we really might be ableRead More to save Cohanzie!
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !