.
Feedback

New London Looking Into Joining Waterford

City Council appropriates funds for survey to determine cost of combining emergency communications with Waterford

A communications company will survey New London’s emergency radio systems as part of an analysis of the costs that would be involved in joining Waterford’s new emergency system.

The City Council has approved $2,500 to be paid to Tactical Communications—a Guilford company specializing in radio systems for emergency services, municipalities, and businesses—from the Veolia Water private dedicated contribution fund. The money will be used to conduct a needs assessment on New London’s equipment.

The city has approved a with Waterford. The memorandum is not an official agreement with Waterford, but says that Waterford will agree to include New London on its new if the city agrees to do so. It also says New London will operate approximately 215 portable radios and 135 mobile radios in the system, as well as the police department’s dispatch console. Lt. Brett Mahoney of the Waterford Police Department told city councilors the system can meet an accepted radio standard of providing coverage to 95 percent of New London 95 percent of the time.

Let Patch save you time. Get great local stories like this delivered right to your inbox or smartphone every day with our free newsletter. Simple, fast sign-up here.

According to Tactical Communications, the survey will determine how many municipal vehicles require radios, what the installation requirements for the radios are, what models are suitable for installation, and if New London possesses any radios that can currently work in Waterford’s system. The survey will include vehicles in the and as well as the dispatch console. The company estimated that the survey will take 25 hours at a fee of $100 an hour.

First Selectman Dan Steward of Waterford has said the system is a trunked narrow band system, which would allow New London to conduct its own communications without interference but also allow the city to coordinate with other towns in major emergencies.

Steward estimated that New London would have to spend $4 million to upgrade its system to meet a federal requirement to switch over to narrow band communications by January of 2013. He estimated that inclusion on the Waterford system would cost less than $1.1 million, plus installation costs and an annual maintenance contribution of about $102,000.

Although Waterford and East Lyme are considering Mahoney said in an e-mail that if the radio agreement goes through it will result in a combination of equipment rather than a merger of New London’s dispatch operations with Waterford.

“New London would need to make clear to their personnel that this is an equipment only study, and not a combined dispatch venture,” he said. “This needs to be done to avoid any misconception that may exist on the New London dispatch center employees that this is a dispatch center merger.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !