.
Feedback

Is Dominion Being Taxed Out Of Town?

Bill Raises Energy Rates, Hurts Local Economy, Officials Say

The mission of the General Assembly's Energy and Technology Committee is to decrease the cost of electricity to consumers. To help the cause, the group passed a bill earlier this month that would force Millstone Power Station, which produces 35 percent of Connecticut’s electricity, to pay an additional $300 million annually in taxes.

“It just doesn’t make any sense,” said state Rep. Betsy Ritter, D-Waterford, who is on the committee. “It is horrible policy.”

The bill would put a half-cent per kilowatt-hour tax on coal energy, and one-half of one mill for oil-fueled energy, while putting no additional taxes on natural gas. But the largest tax would go on nuclear energy, which would pay an additional two cents per kilowatt-hour.

Millstone Power Station is the only nuclear power facility in Connecticut, so it would be the only company affected. The new fees would cost Dominion, which owns Millstone, an additional $300 million per year, Dominion spokesman Ken Holt said.

“It is one of the stupidest things the state has ever tried to do, and that is really saying something,” said J.W. “Bill” Sheehan, who is the chairman of the State of Connecticut Nuclear Energy Advisory Council and a member of Waterford’s board of finance.

Effect On Electricity Rates

The idea is to use the $300 million revenue to invest in new clean energy, and the new tax will not raise the price to consumers, supporters of the bill said. That is utter nonsense, Ritter said.

“(The General Assembly) always passes these additional taxes on energy suppliers and says it will not increase the cost of electrical rates, and they always do,” she said. “Every single one we have passed, they say it won’t increase the cost, and every single one has increased the cost to all ratepayers in Connecticut.”

Dominion is locked into long-term contracts with suppliers, so it theoretically cannot renegotiate the rate, Ritter said. However, that isn't the truth, she said.

“I don’t know a contract in the United States of America that can’t reopen over $300 million,” Ritter said. “That is a pretty large bill to deal with.”

Even if it cannot get out of the contracts, it will be able to eventually, she said. And when it does, it will raise the rates beyond what it needs to be to make up for all the money it lost, she said.

That is, if Dominion keeps it doors open. If Dominion cannot renegotiate contracts and is forced to absorb the entire $300 million in annual costs, the company will likely no longer be profitable, Holt said.

If the evaluation is done and the company realizes it can no longer make money, it will stop producing energy, Holt said. The company's goal is to make money, not lose money, he said.

“We won’t operate at a loss,” Holt said. “Our job as a business is to make electricity, yes, but we are in the business, like every other business, of making money.”

If Millstone stops producing electricity, the supply of energy would go down, so the prices would be forced up, Holt said. It is impossible to levy a $300 million cost on a company and not have the product become more expensive, he said.

“(The bill) will increase the electric bill of every single Connecticut resident,” he said.

Anti-Business

This bill is fundamentally anti-business, Holt, Sheehan, Ritter and Waterford First Selectman Dan Steward said. The state sees a company making money and has decided to go after it, Ritter said.

“Dominion cannot be the solution to the state’s spending problem,” Holt said.

Local Impact

While the passing of this bill would affect everybody in Connecticut, the effect in Waterford would be totally destructive, Steward said. Millstone is both the town’s biggest taxpayer, paying 30 percent of the total property taxes, and its biggest employer, with more than 1,650 employees, according to town records.

Because the new bill would decrease the company’s profits, it would affect the assessment of Millstone Power Station, Ritter said. Town Assessor Michael Bekech was not available Friday for verification, but it would probably equal millions of dollars a year in taxpayer revenues lost, Ritter said.

To remain profitable, Millstone would also likely have to resort to layoffs, Ritter said. If Dominion decided to stop producing electricity altogether, the layoffs would be worse, Ritter said.

Holt would not confirm that Dominion would be forced to lay off employees in either scenario, saying the company would have to evaluate the situation and then make a decision. But he did say it was possible it could happen.

Where The Bill Stands

The bill was passed 12-9 by the energy committee, and will next go to the finance committee, Ritter said. If it passes there, it will go before the House and Senate.
State Sen. Andrea Stillman, D-Waterford, is on the finance committee, and has strongly opposed the bill, Ritter said.

In the energy committee, only Ritter and one other delegate represent an area east of the Connecticut River.

State Sen. John Fonfara and State Rep. Vickie Nardello, who both support the bill and are the co-chairs of the energy and technology committee, did not return phone calls.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !