.
Feedback

Gov. Malloy Announces New Plan To Better Serve the Elderly and Disabled in Connecticut

Waterford is seeing an increase in their elderly population. The state promises a town-by-town projection of long-term care needs and strategies to meet those needs.

A Press Release from Governor Dannel Malloy's Office   

This week, Governor Dannel P. Malloy announced the release of the Strategic Plan to Rebalance Long-Term Services and Supports, a town-by-town projection of Connecticut’s long-term care needs and strategies to meet those needs.

The Governor also announced that up to $72.8 million in federal funding will be awarded to support the expansion of homecare services for seniors and adults with disabilities. The federal funding, combined with a $13 million state investment, marks the first step in a rebalancing plan to expand long-term care services and reduce spending on costly institutional care. It will also help the nursing home industry adapt to the changing needs of elders and other adults with disabilities. 

“Planning for our future includes making strategic decisions to ensure that the health services people need are available,” said Governor Malloy. “We have to find cost-effective ways of providing high-quality care in people’s homes — it improves quality of life and reduces expenses for consumers and government.” 

Coordinated by the Department of Social Services (DSS), the “Strategic Plan to Rebalance Long-Term Services and Supports” represents over a year’s work by consumers, advocates, home care and other service providers, the nursing home industry, and the state. It uses census and demographic data to develop town-by-town projections for long-term care needs. The analysis will help focus services in specific areas, enlist local planning, and help nursing home operators adapt to meeting anticipated demand. 

“Consumers deserve more choices and options for quality long-term care services and supports,” said Department of Social Services Commissioner Roderick L. Bremby. “At the same time, government must ensure we are using taxpayer dollars in the best way possible. The strategic rebalancing plan and investments are a way to guide and accelerate this process of change for everyone’s benefit — better, more individualized care that is less costly.” 

The Strategic Plan to Rebalance Long-Term Services and Supports includes: 

  • connecting the public to information about long-term care services and supports;
  • increasing the number of transitions of long-term nursing home residents to the community;
  • closing service gaps, improving existing services, and identifying new services;
  • ensuring quality of care;
  • building capacity in the community workforce to sustain rebalancing goals;
  • focusing on housing and transportation supports; and
  • helping transform nursing facilities into community-based continuing care providers serving a range of needs.

 
State, Federal Investments to Increase Consumer Choice

Recognizing the need to shift away from institutional care, Governor Malloy and the legislature added $10 million in bond funding and $3 million in general fund support to the state budget this fiscal year to help nursing facilities “right-size” by diversifying care models, downsizing, and modernizing. 

The intent is to implement a strategic, coordinated approach to reducing beds where projections indicate that they will not be needed, and ensuring nursing facilities diversify their services to reflect the home care trends. A request for proposals to help nursing facilities “rightsize” by diversifying their business models is under development and will be released in the coming weeks. 

Up to $72.8 million in additional Medicaid reimbursement was approved by the federal Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) under the State Balancing Incentives Payment Program. Connecticut will receive an enhanced match rate of 2 percent for non-institutional long-term services and supports funded under Medicaid from this month through September 2015, which boosts the federal reimbursement rate to 52 percent in this area. 

“The Balancing Incentive Program provides a strong financial incentive to stimulate greater access to non-institutionally based long-term services and supports,” said CMS official Barbara C. Edwards in the funding award letter.  “[This] reflects Congress’ recognition of the demographic and fiscal imperatives to reshape our long-term care system to meet the needs of our beneficiaries and assure the future viability of the system.” 

“This funding will be an important component of the state’s rebalancing agenda, including transitioning over 1,400 individuals to date from institutional settings to the community,” said Kate McEvoy, DSS Interim Health Services Director.  “Connecticut is also working with and providing funding to nursing facilities to help them diversify their services; a major workforce development effort; and engaging in a public education campaign.” 

Medicaid and nursing home trends

Connecticut’s Medicaid spending remains weighted toward institutional settings.  In fiscal year 2012, 56 percent of long-term care clients were living in the community, but their costs represented only 41 percent of all long-term service expenditures. 

That ratio has improved markedly over the years, but more expensive institutional care is consuming the majority of long-term care spending for a minority of clients — only 7 percent of the overall Medicaid-eligible population received long-term care services and supports in fiscal 2012, but took up 47 percent, or nearly $2.8 billion, of the total Medicaid expenditures. 

While Medicaid continues to fund more than $1.6 billion in institutional care in Connecticut, over the past decade the number of nursing facilities is declining due to lower census — a total of 31 skilled nursing facilities have closed since 2001. 

For those who do not require nursing home care, focusing resources on community care through rebalancing is critical to improving quality of life and containing costs. 

The Plan to Rebalance Long-Term Services and Supports Strategies was released at a meeting with the Department of Social Services, nursing home administrators, home care service providers, and other stakeholders.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !