.
Feedback

Former First Selectman Candidate Calls For Suspensions of Town Officials

Kevin Ziolkovski said he wants Waterford’s top brass to be suspended and tried to get another man arrested after he said the town is doing little to stop his home from flooding.

For Kevin Ziolkovski, the song remains the same.

This week, he sent a formal complaint to Waterford’s human resource director demanding First Selectman Dan Steward, Planning Director Tom Wagner, Fire Director Bruce Miller and Police Chief Murray Pendleton be suspended. This comes after his unsuccessful attempt earlier this month to arrest Robert Schacht, owner of Millers Pond dam.

The reason? The same reason Ziolkovski ran for First Selectman in 2011 and the same reason he is suing the town. Ziolkovski said his property has been flooded five times since 2007, most recently in 2010, and it is the town’s and Schacht’s fault.

“I don’t know what else I have to do,” Ziolkovski said. “Nobody is fixing it, everybody is saying it is not their problem.”

Meanwhile Schacht has said he has “lost all compassion for Mr. Ziolkovski.” Town officials said that Ziolkovski’s home is in a flood plain and homes that are in flood plains flood from time to time.

“I don’t have any control over the weather, I don’t have any control over the elevation of Mr. Ziolkovski’s house and I don’t have any control over what God puts into Hunts Brook,” Schacht said. “At first I had compassion for Mr. Ziolkovski, even after he sued me, because his house was flooded and that is a pain... But now I don’t really have any compassion for him anymore.”

The Story

Ziolkovski said his family has lived on Millers Pond Road for more than two centuries and before 1950 the property never flooded. But then, the town installed a bridge on Bloomingdale Road with three culverts upstream from his home, and he alleges the culverts are insufficient and cause his home to be flooded.

Meanwhile, Schacht lives upstream from Ziolkovski on Millers Pond Road and owns the dam at Millers Pond. The original dam was used as a dam for a mill, but was rebuilt in 1999 as Millers Pond could be used as a possible water source, Schacht said.

In 2006, after leaving Millers Pond dry for several years, Schacht refilled it per recommendation of the DEEP. In 2007, Ziolkovski’s property was flooded. In 2008 and 2009, it was flooded but not as bad, and in March of 2010 his property was flooded and his construction equipment he kept in sheds in his yard were destroyed.

Schacht said the dam was never built to alleviate flooding, it was built to withstand heavy rains, which it has done. He said if the dam were to burst, Ziolkovski’s home would be destroyed.

Still, the town wanted to use it as a way to mitigate potentially flooding, so in 2011, before Tropical Storm Irene, they asked Schacht to lower Millers Pond before it hit. Before Superstorm Sandy, Schacht did the same and called police dispatch letting him know that he did. This upset Ziolkovski, who despite suing for an injunction to have the pond drained in 2011, said the move was against the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection’s regulations.

Call to Police

Earlier this month, Ziolkovski called the Waterford Police Department and asked them to arrest Schacht for reckless endangerment for lowering the pond. Wagner and Schacht agreed that lowering the pond could lower the chance of flooding, but Ziolkovski said it was against DEEP regulations.

The Waterford Police Department investigated and said they found no reason to arrest Schacht. Undeterred, this week Ziolkovski sent a letter to the human resources director and the local media asking for the suspension of Steward, Miller, Pendleton and Wagner for encouraging Schacht to lower the pond.

Schacht, when interviewed Wednesday, said he was getting frustrated with Ziolkovski’s actions. He said he lowered the pond to decrease the chance of flooding and was disappointed that Ziolkovski called the police.

Ziolkovski replied that he didn’t think Schacht checked to see if the culverts were blocked before he lowered the pond, which could have flooded his home. It didn’t, and his home was not flooded during Sandy or Irene.

Steward said Ziolkovski lives in a flood plain and when there are heavy rains, like in March of 2010, it will flood. Wagner said the same, saying that culverts often flood over and that Schacht did the right move by lowering the pond.

According to the police report on Ziolkovski’s complaint, the DEEP said Schacht should have told them he was lowering the pond, even if it was the best course of action. The DEEP said it would work with Schacht to develop a plan on what to do before storms.

Schacht said he lowered the pond on a Saturday, when DEEP offices are closed, and did tell the police. He said he would work with the DEEP to develop a strategy on what to do before storms.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 22, 2013 at 06:57 pm
That's wonderful Naty! If we can get enough people like yourself, who care, we really might be ableRead More to save Cohanzie!
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !