Conservancy Concerned For Riverside Park's Future

Calls from mayor’s former transition chairman, language on special meeting agenda make group members uncertain whether they will see a renewed political battle

Members of the have vowed to keep up their efforts to retain as municipal property after a financial crunch and calls from the former transition chairman for Mayor Daryl Finizio renewed fears that the property could be sold to the .

Finizio called a special City Council meeting on Friday “to discuss the potential purchase and sale of real estate by the city of New London.” The meeting was cancelled due to concerns over whether it would violate the Freedom of Information Act, but Finizio met individually with councilors before announcing that New London faces a .

Finizio said the methods to address the budget crunch could include selling city assets, but referred to his past position on Riverside Park when asked if the property was under consideration. During his campaign, Finizio was opposed to the proposed sale of about half of the 18-acre park to the Coast Guard Academy for $2.9 million.

The question went before voters at the November ballot, and was defeated in a close vote after a .

Calls from de Vars

Ronna Stuller and Kathleen Mitchell, members of the Friends of Riverside Conservancy, each said they received a phone call before the meeting from Allyn de Vars, who prior to Finizio taking office. de Vars is no longer employed by Finizio, but said the mayor sometimes consults with him on issues.

“I’m still not really sure whether he was acting on behalf of the mayor, if he knew me and wanted to put out feelers about the option of using Riverside Park as a means to resolve the budget crisis,” said Stuller. “I think he did want to assure me that the budget crisis is real, and I’m not one of the people that doubts this.”

Stuller said their discussion included talk about the budget situation, and that she concluded from the conversation that the sale of Riverside Park is under consideration since the academy is a known potential buyer.

“He definitely presented it as a possible option, and I think in part he was seeking other opinions and other options,” said Stuller. "But the idea of selling the park for obviously a lot more than $2.9 million was one of the things that was being considered.”

Mitchell said de Vars discussed the budget situation with her, and she told him she had heard one offer from the academy would give $5 million to the city as well as the promise that the national Coast Guard museum would be located in New London. She said de Vars responded, “Try $15 million.”

“He made no bones about it when he called me that he was calling for the mayor,” said Mitchell.

Response from de Vars

de Vars said he has known Finizio, Mitchell, and Stuller since about 2005. He said the calls were personal rather than on behalf of the mayor, and that he made them to assuage concerns regarding Riverside Park. de Vars said he had also noticed that Mitchell had started posting about the park in online forums following the announcement of its meeting.

“It’s just the way she operates she goes out she beats on the drum really hard and my intentions there were just saying, ‘Hey, wait until the whole picture comes out,’” he said.

de Vars said the discussion of a sales price was more theoretical, and that Mitchell said the conservancy considers that the park is not for sale at any price. He said Finizio has said publicly and privately that his position on the park has not changed, and recalled that Finizio had stated prior to taking office that he considered the initial tally supporting the sale moot because the .

“We fought like hell to support the park during his campaign and it’s not his desire to put that park up for sale,” said de Vars.

Wednesday meeting

“I think that the mayor probably meant during his campaign that he didn’t want to sell Riverside Park, but he may not have realized the reality of the situation,” said Mitchell.

Mitchell said she thinks Finizio is under pressure from the academy and other officials to make the sale, and is considering whether to ask a City Council subcommittee to investigate the academy’s connection with municipal affairs. She said she also believes the academy has enough room to meet its expansion needs on campus and that the conservancy remains committed to retaining the park.

“We will go to any lengths to save that park,” said Mitchell.

Stuller said the conservancy was organized as an open space group to maintain and renovate the park, but would renew its political efforts if a sale is announced. She said the conservancy may have a statement on the matter after its regular meeting on Wednesday.

“My view was what it’s always been: that the park can’t be on the table,” said Stuller. “I don’t think it will solve the budget issue even in the short run. It would be a huge breach of trust to the mayor’s supporters.”

Note: a blog from Kathleen Mitchell regarding Riverside Park will post at 10:30 a.m. this morning.

Jason Morris February 06, 2012 at 03:21 PM
Well put Michael.
Jason Morris February 06, 2012 at 03:29 PM
your sadness doesn't seem to keep you from spreading the negativity. sounding the alarms and tooting your own horn so quickly after the first strong mayor in about 90 years has taken office only shows you are: not in touch with the majority, haven't come to terms with your loss, and can't seem to use the respected methods of the true local supporters that don't include such slander.
Jason Morris February 06, 2012 at 03:40 PM
yes there are. i'm not necessarily one of them, but i support the office, and some of the decisions he's made. it's ridiculous to expect the first strong mayor in around 90 years to take every step perfectly. americans have become so hyper-critical due to our "modern politics". we have to stand up out of our lay-z-boys and let our local government know how we feel about issues - with respect and even a little class (sending your kid out of a restaurant so he/she wouldn't see you bash the mayor and his partner in public would be a bad example of class). complaining doesn't do anything, action does. Facts, data, and unbiased truth are more important than opinion.
Jason Morris February 06, 2012 at 03:43 PM
you handled it well James, it's a shame that happened.
Jason Morris February 06, 2012 at 03:55 PM
i like all of the ideas in this thread. i'm not familiar with drafting proposals like this but they all sound reasonable to consider...especially the football field, though. i don't work at the academy...but it does seem to be rarely used.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »