.
Feedback

Commission: No Sewer Rate Increase Needed After All

The Waterford Utility Commission agreed it no longer needs a sewer rate increase to balance its budget two weeks after trying to get a rate approved by the Waterford Representative Town Meeting.

Tuesday night, the Waterford Utility Commission agreed it didn’t need to raise sewer rates to balance its budget for the current fiscal year, 15 days after trying to get a sewer rate increase finalized by the Waterford Representative Town Meeting.

On October 1st, the Waterford RTM rejected a proposal by the Waterford Utility Commission to increase sewer rates 6.28 percent to balance its budget. If the RTM would have approved the proposal, the rate increase would have been finalized and instituted, but instead RTM members rejected it because lack of information.

However at their meeting Tuesday night, the Utility Commission received its sewer treatment bill from New London – a bill it receives twice a year – and found it to be much less than expected. Utility Commission Chairman Peter Green said the bill in April should be similar, and if so, the commission would only have to spend $1.27 million on sewer treatment instead of its estimated cost of $1.5 million.

“Everyone (Tuesday) night was pleased we could go through another year without a rate increase,” Green said. “We just have to be very careful to of our expenditures.”

Green said from now on, the commission will likely wait until that first bill arrives from New London before asking the RTM for a rate increase to avoid a situation like this in the future. He said the budget for the Utility Commission is made up in the spring for the entire upcoming year, which runs from July 1 to June 30, and all indications at the time pointed to the Utility Commission needing a rate increase.

Specifics

In the last fiscal year, which ended July 30th, 2012, the Utility Commission ran a $133,864 deficit. The main reason was because sewer treatment costs – a cost dictated by the New London sewer treatment plant and which Waterford has no control over – increased from $1.08 million in the previous year to $1.76 million, Green said.

To compensate, the Utility Commission raised its budgeted total for this current fiscal year for sewer treatment costs to $1.5 million. To hit that estimated expense, the commission agreed to raise the sewer consumption charge 10 percent from $3.50 per 100 cubic feet of water used to $3.85 per 100 cubic feet of water used, while keeping the $180 per EDU charge the same.

The commission asked the RTM to approve that increase on October 1st; arguing it was necessary to avoid a deficit. The RTM rejected that proposal for a variety of reasons, most of all that the Utility Commission gave no “back-up” information to the body ahead of time. At the time, Utility Commission members said they would again ask for the sewer rate increase at the December RTM meeting.

However last week, the commission received its sewer treatment bill from New London, a bill it receives twice a year. The bill was only $693,154.01 including a once-a-year capital fee, and Green said it was likely the treatment bill in April would be roughly the same, so the total for the year would be an estimated $1.27 million, according to numbers provided by the Board of Finance's Utility Commission liaison J.W. "Bill" Sheehan.

The budgeted amount for sewer treatment costs was $1.5 million - $230,000 more than presumably necessary - and the rate increase was going to bring $175,000 in additional revenue, Green said. Therefore, the Utility Commission agreed the rate increase was no longer needed.

Green said the sewer treatment bill was lower because flow into the plant went down and the depreciation fee the sewer treatment plant charges Waterford went down. Waterford pays the New London sewer treatment a depreciation fee in each billing to pay for future repairs and upgrades to the facility.   

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 22, 2013 at 06:57 pm
That's wonderful Naty! If we can get enough people like yourself, who care, we really might be ableRead More to save Cohanzie!
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.