.
Feedback

Waterford Man Receives 1-Year Sentence For Possessing Child Porn

Curtis Lundfelt Pleads Guilty To Possessing Child Pornography

Curtis Lundfelt of Quaker Hill was raised in East Lyme in a loving, two-parent home. He graduated from college, had a job in the engineering department of Mohegan Sun, is married and is now, for almost a year, a father.

Lundfelt had no criminal history and no history of substance abuse. So you could imagine the surprise when Waterford Police executed a search warrant on his computer in November 2011,

“You couldn’t ask for a more loving, supporting family,” said attorney Jeffrey McNamara, who represented Lundfelt. “They were all shocked by this.”

On Monday, Lundfelt was sentenced by Judge Patrick Clifford to one year in prison, followed by 10 years of parole and Lundfelt will have to register on the sex offender registry for 10 years after he plead guilty to third-degree possession of child pornography. Lundfelt, whose family sat in the New London Court House and watched in the audience, was apologetic.

“I apologize to the court for what I’ve done and to my family,” said Lundfelt, who was born in 1980. “I hope I can become a better citizen.”

The Story

In November, Waterford Police executed a search warrant on two laptops and a homemade computer tower at Lundfelt’s home at 10 Richards Grove Road, where they found more than 450 images and videos of child pornography, according to a press release from Waterford Police and prosecutor Theresa Anne Ferryman. The pictures and videos were of pre-teen children and younger, according to Ferryman.

Lundfelt was originally charged in December of 2011 by Waterford Police with possession of child pornography and importing child pornography, and in March plead guilty to third-degree possession of child pornography. His five-year sentence, suspended after one year is the mandatory minimum for that crime, according to Clifford.

Lundfelt’s wife and parents, the latter of which live next door, knew nothing of the child pornography until Waterford Police executed the search warrant in November, McNamara said. McNamara said Lundfelt has taken full responsibility for the crime and has voluntarily entered counseling.

“He is very sorry for his actions,” McNamara said. “He will work though this.”

There was no evidence of Lundfelt ever abusing a child, according to Ferryman. Clippard said cases like this, where people with no criminal history and loving families are found with “unthinkable” materials on their computer, are becoming more and more common.

Lundfelt’s wife and parents watched the sentencing Monday, and declined comment after the sentencing ended.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !