.
Feedback

Lawsuit Against PD Claims Ex-Officer Framed Waterford Man

Plaintiff says former Waterford police officer Matthew Hutchings became romantically involved with his ex-girlfriend, then set him up on false charges, causing "severe emotional distress."

A Waterford man is suing four members of the Waterford Police Department, alleging that a Waterford officer had a sexual relationship with the mother of his child and then framed him on a charge of stealing plants from a local nursery, causing him "severe emotional distress."

John Troland, a former Vernon Police Officer and a convicted felon, is suing Waterford Police Chief Murray Pendleton, Waterford Police Sgt. Jonathan Pettigrew and officers Steven Whitehead and Matthew Hutchings for "malicious prosecution" and “extreme and outrageous conduct for the purpose of causing (Troland) to suffer severe emotional stress.”

Troland alleges that Hutchings had a sexual relationship with the mother of his child and then, with help from Pettigrew and Whitehead, framed him on a charge of fifth-degree larceny.

Troland also says in the lawsuit that he told Pendleton that Hutchings was biased against him and Pendleton did nothing. Pendleton did not comment on the case per town policy, deferring to the town attorney, and Troland’s lawyer, John Williams of New Haven, said because of the nature of the suit, he didn't feel comfortable discussing it publicly and said he would let the complaint speak for itself.

Background/The Complaint

Troland was a Vernon Police Officer, but was arrested and eventually pleaded guilty in 2006 to interfering with an officer and a third-degree computer crime, a felony, and was sentenced to 18 months in prison. Troland was arrested after he allegedly leaked information to his girlfriend about narcotics investigators and their informants, which his girlfriend gave to the subjects of the narcotic investigations, and for illegally using the law enforcement database, according to the Hartford Courant.

In his complaint, written by Williams, Troland alleges that in 2010 he was trying to evict his girlfriend and the mother of his son, Lori Gilleo, from his Waterford residence. The complaint claims that in retaliation, Gilleo falsely accused Troland of threatening her.

Hutchings was tasked with investigating the accusation, and soon became Gilleo’s lover, according to the complaint. The lawsuit alleges that Hutchings sent Gilleo nude photographs of himself “in a sexually aroused state” and sent her sexually-explicit text messages.

Troland says he contacted Pendleton in December of 2010 and January of 2011, telling the chief that Hutchings "had exhibited open bias against him." The complaint alleges Pendleton did nothing and continued to allow Hutchings to investigate the case, and "thereby encouraged and condoned the misconduct of (Hutchings)."

On Jan. 24, 2011, the complaint alleges that Hutchings and Whitehead “maliciously and intentionally fabricated a false affidavit” accusing Troland of stealing plants from a local nursery, based partly on statements Hutchings received from Gilleo. On Feb. 2, 2011, Hutchings and Pettigrew “participated personally in a surprise arrest” of Troland for fifth-degree larceny “in a manner that would cause the plaintiff the greatest possible emotional distress,” according to the complaint. The suit also claims that Hutchings later said, "Arresting that guy made my day.”

According to the complaint, the arrest was thrown out of court, as well as a tangential arrest for violating probation, and it “became clear” to the State’s Attorneys in New London and Rockville that Troland had been framed.

Troland is suing for compensatory damages, punitive damages, attorney fees and costs. Hutchings resigned from the Waterford Police Department in 2011.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 22, 2013 at 06:57 pm
That's wonderful Naty! If we can get enough people like yourself, who care, we really might be ableRead More to save Cohanzie!
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !