.
Feedback

The Plot To Nuke New London

Thirty-five years ago, the FBI broke up a strange plan that involved using a stolen submarine to destroy the city

Thirty-five years ago, the FBI foiled a plot to nuke New London. Sort of.

Given the military presence along the Thames River, I wouldn’t be surprised if the Soviet Union had a missile or two pointed in this direction during the Cold War. But this was a plan I stumbled across in the news archives, one with high aspirations and low feasibility. It got coverage nationwide and then was promptly forgotten.

It didn’t involve your Die Hard level super-terrorists who could pull off a major heist, but rather a bumbling trio of men in their 20s. This crack team was made up of James W. Cosgrove, a Navy veteran; Edward J. Mendenhall, an insurance company employee; and Kurtis J. Schmidt, a carpet cleaner. Their plan: pull together a 12-man pirate crew and blow up a maintenance vessel alongside the USS Trepang, a nuclear submarine then docked at State Pier. In the ensuing confusion, the men would board the Trepang, kill her crew of more than 100 sailors, and sail into the Atlantic to sell the $69 million vessel.

Oh, and that last step would be done “possibly after firing a nuclear missile at New London or another East Coast city” as a distraction, according to a contemporary account.

New London has survived a lot. Benedict Arnold burned it down and it came back. The Hurricane of 1938 demolished a good deal of the city, but it came back. It would have been something of an anticlimactic end for New London if it was knocked out for the count by a deranged carpet cleaner with his finger on the button.

Thankfully, the plan never came to pass. The FBI got wind of the plan and, as tends to happen in the planning such outlandish stunts, they tried to secure funding and support from a person who turned out to be an undercover agent. The men set up a meeting with the interested party/agent in St. Louis and were promptly arrested.

It seemed no one thought the plan had any chance of success. The Navy asserted that the raid never would have succeeded and that a skeleton crew wouldn’t be able to operate the Trepang anyway. As for the idea of nuking New London, the explanation that always came down was that the nuclear missiles in the submarine’s armament were only designed for use against water targets and that it wouldn’t be possible to use them against a city.

It turned out that the men hadn’t even really been planning to carry this plan out. The lawyers suggested that their scheme was perhaps even more thickheaded: pitch the idea to the Mafia, get a $300,000 down payment, and then simply split up the money and disappear. Because apparently Tony Soprano favors stolen Navy property to a nice yacht and nothing bad ever happens when you try to cheat the mob.

This was the version that eventually went to trial. So it was that Cosgrove and Mendenhall were convicted only of wire fraud. If I’m reading this correctly, it means the men were guilty of fraud because they weren’t going to follow through on their promise to steal a submarine and commit mass murder. Mendenhall got five years in prison, Cosgrove four. Schmidt avoided incarceration by agreeing to testify for the prosecution.

There was one final oddball coda. Several years after the incident, a businessman named Charles Rosene—whom the trio initially approached on the assumption that he had connections to the underworld—sued the government. Rosene had tipped off the FBI after the men broached the plot to him, and now complained that he had not received any reward for his help.

One of his stipulations: he wanted a ride on a submarine.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 22, 2013 at 06:57 pm
That's wonderful Naty! If we can get enough people like yourself, who care, we really might be ableRead More to save Cohanzie!
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !