.
Feedback

Old News

Finding local facts that are just as good as fiction in a newspaper from the 1800s.

I recently stumbled across something I would never have even thought to look for. In the Repository, a New London newspaper first published in 1858, a correspondent using the pseudonym Pequot wrote two short pieces under the heading “Waterford In Olden Times.”

The first concerns the memories of “Patriarch of Waterford” Stedman Newbury, who had died about 80 years earlier and whose diary the writer was allowed to see. The keeping of the “memorandum-book” had begun with Stedman Newbury’s grandfather Nathaniel Newbury, whose first notation was a record of his marriage to his wife Elizabeth in 1706. He listed their children: Nathaniel, Jr., Elizabeth, Samuel, Mary, Hannah, Nathan, Eunice, Sarah, one name that is illegible, and another I’ll be adding to my roster of outstanding Colonial-era names: Mehitable.

The bulk of Pequot’s story recounts an experience that Nathaniel (the son) had on Plum Island. He’d moved there because his wife Hannah Lester’s sister married Mr. Beebe, who owned the island. On a cold, windy March day, he and some other settlers on the island set out for a mill on Long Island in their only boat. They were quickly overturned by “a flaw of wind.” Nathaniel, a “very strong man and a good swimmer” in his own estimation, managed to help all his fellow passengers onto the capsized craft. But he could not flip the boat over in the rough waves. One by one, despite Nathaniel’s exhortations, they grew too cold and gave up. “One after another,” he related to his son later, “my companions dropped off and perished in the sea.”

He stayed there overnight, close to shore but unheard over the crashing waves. Just before morning his wife thought she heard a voice and led the others to the water. As dawn lit the scene they saw the boat, and at length remembered an old canoe in a barn. They “stuffed the wide cracks with blankets and seaweed” and sailed to rescue Nathaniel. He said, “For months I was not expected to live, but a kind providence smiled, and in about six months I began to recover.”

He later left Plum Island, whether because of that incident or not is unclear, and lived in Jordan (or “on Jordan” as the Repository article has it.) His house there was passed down to his son Stedman, owner of the memorandum-book.

There was something about this story that made me wonder if these people were fictional. True stories of the fortitude of 18th century families can evolve - or devolve - into clichés, mixtures of 19th
century sensationalism and Biblical begats. But the Newburys of Waterford were absolutely real. Nathaniel Newbury’s house had a gambrel roof, and might be the oldest house in Jordan village. Stedman Newbury also liked gambrel roofs, and built three houses himself. He sold his father’s house to “Black Dick” Morgan, who was rumored to have been a pirate, proving, I suppose, that there’d be no need to fictionalize any early Waterford tale. Stedman also served in the Revolutionary War. He is buried on Mullen Hill Road.

I was going to write more here about the Newburys, and the very strange second installment of “Waterford In Olden Times.” But as Pequot found, it really deserves its own column. At the end of his first essay he promised to return with “an anecdote of [Nathaniel’s] wife, Hannah ester, and with your permission bestow a passing notice on their neighbors on Jordan a century ago.” With the addition of another century and a half, I promise to do the same.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !