Through the years I’ve been a generally well-behaved political spouse. But this year, because the choices in the Republican primary are so stark, and so much is at stake, I may be a little less well-behaved. I’m going to write a series of short blogs from the perspective of 35 years and 21 elections by Chris’ side in the political arena. You can expect straight talk.
Here’s the fourth entry:
David and Goliath
When we got into this race, we knew it would have a David and Goliath quality to it.
Goliath, as you may remember, seemed to have all the obvious advantages (formidable reputation, prodigious size, dressed in armor from head to toe, looking for a fight, and totally confident in his invincibility). This terrified his opponents and sent them running for the hills. . .sometimes before the fight.
David, on the other hand, was a simple shepherd boy – a seemingly laughable match for such a formidable opponent. Armed with a sling and five smooth stones, trust in the worthiness of his assignment, and confidence in the ultimate triumph of good, he ran – eagerly – to face Goliath.
We know how the story ends. The shepherd boy with the sling prevailed. It turns out – despite all the hype – it only took one smooth stone to bring Goliath down.
Through the ages, this story has given courage to many an underdog heart and venture. Including ours.
Underdog in This Race
When we thought about getting into this race, Chris knew he would be the underdog at the convention and in the primary. He knew he would be outgunned in terms of resources and organization. He jumped in anyways. You could say, he ran toward the challenge.
Why? Because he has spent a lifetime committed to a few core principles:
1. HOW you get things done matters.
2. Straight talk matters.
3. Respecting the intelligence of the voters matters.
4. Constant listening and learning matter.
5. Finding common ground to get things done matters.
(Goliaths tend to operate by a very different set of principles – especially those in the political arena.)
When you feel those principles are being compromised – as Chris did when he watched the 2010 U.S. Senate race unfold – you can either sit on the sidelines in 2012 or jump in. He jumped in.
Get Out
Last summer one of our opponent’s top strategists explained to me how, in considerable detail, his candidate was going to win the general election. The message seemed to be: “Get out of the race before you even jump in.”
Then, when Chris announced, informally, in October he was in the race, our opponent’s team went around saying, “When he realizes what he’s up against, he’ll be out of the race by the end of the month”.
In November, they said the same thing.
Again, in December.
In January, Chris made a formal announcement he was in the race. At that point their message changed to: “We will be the inevitable winners”, and so it continued up through and after the convention in May.
Since the convention, there has been a flood of advertising to rebrand their candidate as a grandmother, a sweet lady, the woman next door (even Goliath might have blushed at such a bodacious PR campaign!)
Armor
When you are outgunned in terms of money and resources, you better have some armor and a sling.
Here’s what armed Chris though a lifetime of public service:
1. Integrity
2. Respected experience
3. Deep knowledge of the issues
4. Proven leadership
5. Guts
If these matter to you, you can help defeat a political Goliath.
Roll them all together, you have a candidate in Christopher Shays who is ready to go on day one to help move our country in the right direction, get our fellow Americans back to work, and restore the promise of America.
When you think about it, it shouldn’t even be a contest.
FNC THE OREILLY FACTOR 1,724 349 684 CNN ANDERSON COOPER SPCL RPT 300 67 107 MSNBC Ed Show 620 166 243 CNBC BIG MAC: INSIDE MCDONALDS 110 54 63 HLN Nancy Grace 429 119 249
take away peoples source of income (aka jobs) and they will eventually fall to the street. high level crime lives very well at the top of the food chain, far from the street.
just as politicians claim to represent their constituents, the unions claim to defend the rights of their members (their voting, fee paying members). both have a common goal, a narrow one nonetheless. it is in their best interest to keep their followers from holding/wielding power. do you prefer to be in the foxes position or the hens? from the position of the ground tick (Ixodes scapularis), it is the hen who is the predator. notice the level of engagement as the time of choice looms closer, just as your hunger becomes greater, you seek food, often recklessly
Connecticut residents would get rocked the worst, with an additional cost of $5,783 a year... Here's the link: http://finance.yahoo.com/news/bush-tax-cuts-end-cost-181220449.html
Again, did you forget the Obama controlled BOTH the house and the senate the first 2 years of his term. While I don't support Bush or his wars, did you forget that Obama, who controlled both the house and the senate for the first 2 years of his term, has continued all of Bush's wars and also started a few new ones like Somalia, Yemen, Syria, Liberia and Libya??? @J. Sosallter says; "So a new president should suspend all expenditures under a previously adopted budget, the lion's share of which are military. The smooth succession of leadership depends on NOT doing that." So the new president, who campaigned on pulling the troops right out of Iraq "and you can take that to the bank" was lying all along??? What "smooth succession of leadership" are you talking about? The new President campaigned on NOT following W's policies then when he got in office, he not only continued W's policies, but amped them up, spent more, increased the debt more, and started a few more wars. And you call this what, a "smooth transition of leadership?" Bush was pretty bad (wars, spending, bill of rights and debt), but he's got nothing on the act that followed him who accelerated and increased all his policies and added a few new ones to boot.
I cannot speak intelligently on this subject because my knowledge of economics is practically nil. But, no one, absolutely no one makes 3 trillion dollars a year.
Yes, Malvi, the annual state income tax on this kind of income would be more than 4x the whole state budget. I hope you will reconsider your position on numbers, especially in light of your campaign for state office.
Malvi Lennon 8:03 am on Friday, August 17, 2012 Speaking of HEdge Funds- Bridgewater just received 115M from our dear Governor Malloy. The kickers are - Bridgewater's CFO earned over 3 TRILLION d9ollars last year- and while the corporate crony capitalism for those who support Malloy and Dems continue small businesses received notice from the Feds that CT has not paid back the additional unemployment loan from the feds, hence businesses are liable for the interest accured to the tune of about $25.00 per employee. But hey don't forget it is the R that are waging a war on the working class- Malloy and Co are just spreading the rich's wealth to those who are even wealthier.
Chris Shays lost. Linda McMahon is running but it won't make a difference. Connecticut will vote Democrat no matter who is on the ballot. The last Republican senator to win in Connecticut was Lowell Weiker in 1970... some 42 years ago. Career politician Chris Murphy will win the Senate seat. Expect more of the same for Connecticut. Forward.
http://proteinwisdom.com/?p=42811 http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/11/14/how-visa-courted-nancy-pelosi-hoping-to-forestall-swipe-fee-changes.html Regardless of which party you belong too, it's time to get rid of incumbents, Reid, Pelosi, Boener, McConnel, I think Peter Schweizer said it all in his book this year, http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2011/11/13/peter-schweizer-s-new-book-blasts-congressional-corruption.html