.
Feedback

Why Dominion is Expanding in Virginia, Not Waterford

A look at the many reasons Dominion picked Virginia to build a new nuclear power plant instead of Waterford, and why company officials have said they will not put another reactor in Waterford.

Earlier this month, there was an article on a Fredericksburg news site about the delays associated with Dominion’s effort to build another nuclear reactor at its North Anna Nuclear Power Station in Virginia.

What might be newsworthy, at least to Waterford residents, is that Dominion isn’t building another reactor at Millstone Power Station, despite that the site can hold six reactors and only has three. Not that it is a surprise, as State Rep. Betsy Ritter, D-Waterford, told Patch that Dominion told her it has no plans to build another reactor at Millstone.

A new reactor would mean around 500 to 700 new jobs, would provide millions in tax revenue to the town and the state annually and it would produce enough electricity to power a quarter of Connecticut, according to Millstone spokesman Ken Holt said. Yet Ritter said Dominion has told her and other state officials that they would not build another reactor in Connecticut unless something changes because of the “very demanding regulatory environment” in Connecticut.

Holt said there are many decisions behind building a new reactor, which can take more than a decade to permit and build and can cost more than $5 billion to construct. The demand for electricity in a certain area is important, but so is the regulatory environment of the state, he said.

Virginia's government passed legislation to make it easier for Dominion to build a new reactor, Holt said. Meanwhile, Connecticut has done the opposite.

Virginia Compared to Connecticut

Perhaps the biggest difference between the two states is that Connecticut has a non-regulated energy market and Virginia’s is regulated. That makes a big difference in building a new nuclear reactor, as it requires a “massive upfront capital expenditure,” Ritter said.

In a regulated market, Dominion can begin to charge customers the cost of construction for the reactor while they are building it, Holt said. That means in Virginia, Dominion doesn’t have to take on all the cost upfront, but instead it is put on the ratepayers, he said.

In Connecticut, it is the opposite. Dominion would have to pay for all of the cost upfront of building the plant and then hope to recoup those costs by selling electricity once the reactor is built.

But there are other differences as well. Connecticut has the highest tax burden of any of the states that Dominion has a nuclear power plant in, Holt said. Property taxes and state taxes are both higher on Millstone than at the North Anna site, he said.

The best example is a $42 million annual production tax levied against the plant the past two years. Holt said the company has never dealt with a production tax based off the amount of electricity a plant produces regardless of how much they sell it for, or if they sell it at all.

That tax is expected to sunset this July, Ritter said. The state is facing another tough budget year though, but Ritter said ensuring that tax would indeed sunset would be a high priority for her this upcoming budget year.

Additionally, Ritter said the regulatory climate of Connecticut is high on all businesses in Connecticut, including nuclear power plants. Ritter said that is because there is a strong desire in this state for those regulations.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !