.
Feedback

Waterford P&Z Commission Urges Denial of Proposed Rehab Center

Waterford’s Planning and Zoning Commission is asking the Zoning Board of Appeals to deny a proposal by the Stonington Institute to turn 171 Rope Ferry Road into temporary housing for up to 144 men recovering from substance abuse.

Monday night, the Planning and Zoning Commission had a simple message for the Zoning Board of Appeals: don't to allow a rehab center at 171 Rope Ferry Road.

Monday, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended Waterford’s Zoning Board of Appeals deny a request by the Stonington Institute to turn 171 Rope Ferry Road – currently a 77-room vacant nursing home - into temporary housing for up to 144 men recovering from drug addiction. The Stonington Institute is asking for a use variance at the property to allow it to house all of its patients in one spot.

“Under its planning function as a Planning and Zoning Commission, the Commission does not recommend that a use variance be granted in this instance, as the proposal does not meet the criteria to justify a change of use for the parcel,” the recommendation read. “The Commission recommends that the owner/applicant continue to pursue all viable options for the property under the current zoning uses and specially permitted uses allowed within the R-40 Zone.”

The Zoning Board of Appeals will make its own decision on the proposal Thursday night, but the Planning and Zoning Commission’s recommendation will be entered into the record. The Stonington Institute, a for-profit organization that aims to cure people suffering from drug addiction, is requesting a use variance to allow it to turn 171 Rope Ferry Road into temporary housing for up to 144 men fighting substance abuse.

“Under the Federal (Fair Housing Act), this proposed facility lacks therapeutic care, has a transient boarding house use (30-day stay limit), will create additional security and police expense to the Town, will not benefit from being in the primary single family zone and is not a reasonable accommodation in the zone,” the recommendation read.

Dozens of neighbors of 171 Rope Ferry Road have opposed the proposal, saying it doesn’t fit into a residential neighborhood filled with young children. They argued men who are addicted to drugs or alcohol are prone to crime and said the proposal would decrease the overall safety of the area. According to the proposal, the men would be at the facility voluntarily and could leave whenever they wanted to.

The Zoning Board of Appeals meets on Thursday at 6:30 in Town Hall and is expected to rule on the application.

Recommendations

The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended rejecting the proposal. But if the Zoning Board of Appeals were to approve the application, the commission recommended these conditions (taken straight from the report):

  1. Establish the use in the phases based on the number of beds. Require any expansion into subsequent phases come back to the ZBA for review and approval.
  2. House manager, 24/7 security, full-time director of security
  3. No personal vehicles for clients
  4. 1:10 ratio of staff to client
  5. Lights out at 11 p.m. and all exit doors (egress) be alarmed
  6. 30-minute bed checks
  7. Review of existing lighting and impact off site
  8. Limitations on time of deliveries to kitchen due to this occurring off Spithead Road
  9. Screening and fencing of adjacent properties
  10. Pickup and delivery on site, not on Rope Ferry Road
  11. On-site surveillance

For more information about the Stonington Institute’s proposal, click here. For more about the arguments for and against the proposal, click here.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 18, 2013 at 11:44 am
Where will the meeting take place? I might be able to go to say why it shouldn't be demolished.
Kate May 15, 2013 at 06:36 pm
There are two state agencies that are involved. Both of them are historical preservation societies,Read More and this is what they do, help communities find viable purposes for historic buildings. While the building has been treated as more or less an inconvenience for the town, it is important to remember it is an historic site. It matters. Every town, every city, must look carefully at it's historic buildings and sites with an eye toward preservation, or, you end up with a community full of houses and walmarts. Cohanzie is a unique building for it's architectural style, for it's historic quarry site, and it's importance as a community hub, not to mention the thousands of citizens that passed through. An old building like Cohanzie is built to last. We won't ever see buildings built like that again. We can always build another Walmart. You raise a good question. Maybe once we hear about what could be done with the building, we need a town referendum to find out how the people of Waterford want to proceed. Many historic buildings are saved at the last minute by people who decide history matters. Will Waterford do the same. I don't know the answer.
Maggie L. May 15, 2013 at 01:56 pm
Do you have any proposals for the use of the building? If the town were to keep the building it mostRead More likely will have to be staffed. Do you believe that most town residents would be willing to see an increase in the town budget to allow for additional staff? I'm just tossing out questions because I haven't heard any concrete proposals for the use of the building
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !