.
Feedback

Phasing Out Town-Mandated Age Restrictions?

Another Company Asks For Waterford To Drop A 55-And-Older Age Restriction

Another developer, another request to remove the age restriction from Waterford’s zoning regulations.

In the summer of 2011, by asking the Planning and Zoning Commission to drop the 55-and-older age restriction in the Seaside district, so he could renovate the former sanatorium into high-end condos. The commission , saying the restriction limited the market to the point the property was not marketable.

Now White Knight Development LLC, an Old Lyme company, is asking for the same thing. White Knight Development is requesting the Planning and Zoning Commission drop the age restriction in all R-20 and all R-40 zones, likely so they can build a condominium complex at 317 Rope Ferry Road, home of the historic MacKenzie Barn. 

“Changing times and trends have shown locally and nationally that age-restricted communities are often not in the best interest of the community, and in this case the regulation does not serve Waterford’s long term planning needs,” wrote Matt Berger, a New London lawyer representing White Knight Development, in a letter to the Waterford Planning and Zoning Commission.

White Knight Development is also asking for the commission to drop the minimum acreage from 50 acres to 10 acres for development in those zones, necessary because 317 Rope Ferry Road, a piece of property the company owns, is 12 acres.

The 55-and-older age restriction mandates that residents must be at least 55 years old to buy a property in that zoning area.

Background

On June 6, 2011, White Knight Development bought 317 Rope Ferry Road from Hugh MacKenzie, a former First Selectman of Waterford, for $533,000. , White Knight President Lisa Wadge said she was planning on keeping the house on the property, and was looking into keeping the historic MacKenzie Barn.

Since, White Knight has done some minor work on the home on the property, at least painting the outside. Then on March 26 the company submitted an application to the Planning and Zoning Commission to remove the 55-and-older age restriction and the minimum acreage for development from 50 acres to 10 for all R-20 and R-40 zones (317 Rope Ferry Road is in an R-40 zone).

In his letter, Berger said without those two restrictions, companies will still be able to be environmentally-conscious and neighborhood-friendly with their development. R-40 and R-20 zones encourage “green” and low-impact development, and this will still happen, Berger argues.

“The proposed Planned Residential Development regulation 3.17 would help Waterford ensure the development of housing projects that provide for open space and a livable community and maximize the efficiency created through Green design, to be designed in a manner that is sympathetic to the surrounding neighborhood and sensitive of the ability of the site and infrastructure to accommodate the project,” Berger writes. “The proposed changes would provide for increased design efficiency that has a less impacts on infrastructure than would be expected in an unrestricted housing development.”

The Planning and Zoning Commission received the application Monday night, and will schedule a public hearing soon. Wadge did not respond to a Monday voicemail by Patch asking for comment.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:03 pm
Hi Naty! That would be so great! The next RTM meeting in Waterford is on June 3rd, at 7:00 p.m.Read More The more people who show up and tell the town we want Cohanzie School to be repurposed, the better! This is politics, after all, and it is the residents showing up and telling the town this is a building we care about, this is a property we want access too. Imagine at least the 1923 section being repurposed into some department that would benefit the town. The town will demolish Cohanzie, sell the land and the bricks, and turn around in a year or two and say "We need more space! Let's build a new building!". Why should we do that when Cohanzie School is there, it can be repurposed, and it is so important for our town's history and the Cohanzie community? What if there was a park area where the basketball courts are, a path to walk around the building and down a part of the hill. Sledding could still happen, ball playing or other activities on the lower level. This retains the historic building, the architecture, the Cohanzie name, the community "presence", the hill, the ball field. It can be a place to go and relax. Even a dog park can be built on part of it! There is nothing like that in that section of town. Leary Field is remote and isolated. It is a ball field. With Cohanzie Firehouse and Lisa Dedrick Field right there, you feel the presence of community, without being isolated or unable to grab a quiet moment or more. Come on Waterford. This building and grounds belongs to us. Let's reclaim it before it is demolished and the bricks sold. Don't believe it cannot be repurposed. Asbestos, oil tanks, and other environmental factors are ALWAYS present in old schools, so the experts have told me. Old schools are repurposed all the time. It is a matter of convincing the town officials that this is what we WANT. Please speak up! Please SHOW UP, at the RTM meeting on June 3rd, at the Town Hall at 7:00 p.m. They are waiting to see what kind of turnout we get. Ignoring one resident or twenty is easy. Ignoring 100 or 500 is hard. We can do this, if you HELP.
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !