.
Feedback

Court Rules Closed Plants Can Hold Nuclear Waste For 30 Years, Not 60

Meanwhile, A National Repository Is Nowhere In Sight

Friday, Attorney General George Jepsen announced a decision by the federal appeals court that allows nuclear power plants to hold onto their spent nuclear fuel (i.e. nuclear waste) for up to 30 years after the plant was shut down, instead of 60.

Spokesman Ken Holt was unsure if this would affect Millstone, which has had two plants operating and one shut down since 1998, and has been storing nuclear spent fuel on site since 18 months after it first opened in 1971. For Holt and the rest of the nuclear industry, the push has always been to have , something the federal government has promised in law but has never delivered.

“They are responsible by law for the spent fuel,” said Holt, who was not sure if the ruling would affect the power station in any way.

The Ruling

Originally, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission ruled that plants could hold on to nuclear spent fuel for 60 years after they were shut down. Several states – including Connecticut - challenged that ruling in court, arguing plants should only be able to keep their nuclear spent fuel on site for 30 years.

The federal appeals court agreed with the states, saying the NRC did not consider “future dangers and key consequences” of having the fuel stored on site, according to press release from Jepsen’s office. Jepsen called it a “landmark” decision.

“This is a critical decision for Connecticut and other states with nuclear power plants,” Jepsen said. “It means the federal regulators must make a full and comprehensive analysis of the potential environmental impact of before allowing additional decades of storage of high-level nuclear waste at reactor sites.”

Aside from Millstone, Connecticut has one other decommissioned plant, Connecticut Yankee in Haddam. That site will now be able to hold its waste for 30 years since when it was closed, instead of 60.

How It Applies To Millstone

Holt was not sure if it would apply to Millstone or not. There are three nuclear power plants at the Waterford site, Unit 1, 2 and 3, with Unit 1 being decommissioned in 1998 but Unit 2 and 3 still running.

Therefore, Millstone has stored spent nuclear fuel from Unit 1 on site for the past 14 years after the plant was closed. However, the site is still active, and Holt was unsure if the ruling affects Millstone.

It still remains unclear what would happen with the waste after 30 years, as there is no place to put it. President Barack Obama has cancelled plans for a repository to be built at Yucca Mountain in Nevada, and instead formed a committee to look into the issue.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 22, 2013 at 06:57 pm
That's wonderful Naty! If we can get enough people like yourself, who care, we really might be ableRead More to save Cohanzie!
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)