.
Feedback

Conservation Commission Rejects Kobyluck’s Proposal

Matt Kobyluck Says Town, Planning Director Tom Wagner Are Anti-Business

Wednesday night, the Conservation Commission unanimously rejected an to install a stone processing facility at 28 Industrial Drive.

The Waterford-based company originally for the project, after the commission felt it didn’t have enough information. Kobyluck Brothers resubmitted the application again this winter, only to have it rejected by the commission Wednesday.

Neighbors , arguing it would pollute Jordan Brook and create dust, two points the commission agreed with. Neighbors also hired an engineer to protest the application, and formed a group called Waterford Against Mining.

“It feels good,” said Mark Verity, who is part of Waterford Against Mining. “The commission did the right thing, they made the right decision.”

Kobyluck Brothers' owner Matt Kobyluck didn’t share Verity’s enthuasium. After the meeting in an interview with Patch, he criticized the town’s planning department and particularly Planning Director Tom Wagner, who he said “had way too much responsibility” and the power went to his head.

“There was clearly an agenda behind the scenes,” Kobyluck said. “Tom Wagner had an agenda from the very beginning.”

Kobyluck Brother’s proposal was to excavate the property at 28 Industrial Drive 50 feet down through mainly bedrock while crushing, processing and selling the stone it was removing, a process that would take up to five years. Then, they would install stone crushers at the site and crush stone brought from off-site and sell it.

Reasons Why It Was Rejected

The commission rejected the application because of its potential impacts on the surrounding wetlands, and because Kobyluck Brothers did not provide acceptable alternatives to the plan. The planning staff, led by Environmental Planner Maureen Fitzgerald, wrote an extensive report detailing the problems town staff and commissioners had on the project.

Specifically, the report said the application would adversely affect the water temperature of Jordan Brook, fugitive dust would hurt the wetlands, Kobyluck Brothers did not do enough to control storm water runoff and the application would hurt the existing animals, such as wood frogs and spotted salamanders. The report also said many of these problems would be the worse during the five years of constructing the facility.

“The proposed activity is found to have long-term adverse impacts on wetlands and watercourses due to the proposed long-term operation of the crushing and processing operations at the site,” the report said.

Regarding the water temperature, the report said the water leaving the site would be too warm and ruin the cold-water habitat in Jordan Brook. The report said Kobyluck Brothers did not provide sufficient evidence or alternatives to fix that problem.

Kobyluck’s Reaction

After the meeting, Kobyluck said he was “extremely upset” although not surprised with the ruling. Wagner did not want to see the application passed, and the information he and his staff provided to the commissioners was biased, Kobyluck said.

Kobyluck said Wagner’s actions are anti-business, and Waterford is the worst town around to try to develop property in. He said he had talked to many general contractors in the area, and because of Wagner “the prevailing theme is that they would never build in this town again.”

“For the town, this is unfortunate,” he said.

Kobyluck added he was planning to build his stone processing facility as "a model" for all other stone processing facilities in the state. He said his engineers "poured their heart and soul" into creating the application and he was proud of the work they did.

What’s Next

Kobyluck said he spent hundreds of thousands of dollars on trying to get the application approved, and said “I wouldn’t call this the end.” Kobyluck, who said , has 15 days to file an appeal of the decision in superior court and “would weigh all the options” before making a decision.

Meanwhile, the Planning and Zoning Commission still needs to rule on the application, according to Town Attorney Rob Avena. Wednesday’s rejection doesn’t automatically guarantee a rejection by the Planning and Zoning Commission, but that will be factored in, Avena said.

In December, the Planning and Zoning Commission that make what Kobyluck Brothers is proposing – processing stone brought from off-site – illegal. Kobyluck submitted his application for the stone processing facility before those regulations were adopted, but now his plans for 28 Industrial Drive would be against the town’s regulations.

Kobyluck has appealed

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Waterford Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Loading comments ...
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Richard Waselik May 19, 2013 at 05:57 am
There is no "suckles away". The money is deposited by those that use it. The rest isRead More relentless retoric...
Daniella Ruiz May 19, 2013 at 05:44 am
another 'not for profit' that suckles away at the very core of peoples generosity?? better toRead More 'retire' the banking/WS thieves that casually gore the system with relentless greed, schemes and secrecy.
Ivy's Simply Homemade
nascarblue May 17, 2013 at 08:05 am
happy happy anniversary, i love your food, you can tell when a business takes pride in what they do.Read More wishing you many many more years, i will definatly be back, along with my friends, we love your food.
Kate May 22, 2013 at 06:57 pm
That's wonderful Naty! If we can get enough people like yourself, who care, we really might be ableRead More to save Cohanzie!
Naty Bush May 22, 2013 at 05:12 pm
I'll try my best to get others to go!
Kate May 19, 2013 at 02:05 pm
Oh, and please spread the word, and bring a friend to the meeting! :)
Liz May 12, 2013 at 09:06 pm
Mr. Steiner wants to build 72 three story homes on 32 acres in addition to the 60 condos in the twoRead More large buildings. That is more than two individual units per acre or if you include the 60 condos - that is MORE than 4 units per acre! The area around the property for new building is zoned 3 acres per unit. The average of currently built housing abutting the property is about one acre per unit. That is not in keeping with the neighborhood character.
Daniella Ruiz May 12, 2013 at 05:36 pm
Mr Steiner may be the last hope for this decrepit place. The neighbors need to move along, or buyRead More the place themselves. Change might help the stonewalling attitude that has become evident in nearly the entire town, revolving around exclusive entitled old farts with nothing better to do than remember their glory days of Seaside. Its gone, & it's not going to revert back to a pasture either. (too many complaints about that cow smell and so forth). My advice is to listen carefully and try to work something out, get over your own selfish grandious dreams of Pelham Manor style estates and do SOMETHING before it simply falls apart like Norwich Hospital, the countless thread/manufacturing mills, and every other historic building that has been left to rot.
Daniella Ruiz May 14, 2013 at 08:53 am
mary m>> common sense? heee hee. in this day and age? lawyers have made every attempt toRead More eradicate that concept from our every life activity. write it into some law, that can be thence used as future gurantee of use of, by and for their own existence? it's like job security for that entire group, keep the general public at a disadvantage, unable to apply common sense (whats left of it they havent entombed in laws) and uneasy about acting on their own. John Y has the right attitude, heave the cra.pp on the peoples lawn, and hope it doesn't lay there for days as well!
John Yannacci, Sr. May 13, 2013 at 10:09 am
Mary May, I don't know the legality of posting signs on telephone poles. But, take a ride aroundRead More Waterford on Saturday mornings and you'll see signs on anything that is verticle. Take a ride around the same neighborhoods on Wednesday and half the signs will still be there. I wonder if the folks who have had the same yard sale sign at the corner of Great Neck and Rope Ferry Rds. for two and a half weeks wonder why cars are still stopping at their house every Saturday morning.
Mary May May 13, 2013 at 09:53 am
Um I believe it is ILLEGAl to post ANY sign on a telephone pole ANYWAY but free standing signsRead More should be removed after sale is over ! Really a state law just COMMON SENSE we have lost along the way !